Le codesign d’une plateforme numérique fondé sur des principes au service de l’agentivité des enseignantes et des enseignants en contexte de développement professionnel | Co-Design of a Digital Platform Based on Principles Supporting Teachers’ Agency in the Context of Professional Development

  • Michelle Deschênes Université Laval
  • Thérèse Laferrière Université Laval
Keywords: Agentivité, Codesign, Expérience utilisateur, Développement professionnel, Collégial, User Experience, Professional Development, College

Abstract

Les enseignantes et les enseignants du collégial partagent avec les établissements d’enseignement la responsabilité de leur développement professionnel. Cet article a trait au codesign d’une plateforme numérique au service de l’agentivité des enseignants en situation de développement professionnel. Le processus de codesign a inclus le repérage des freins au développement professionnel ainsi que l’identification des buts de niveau motivationnel. Les résultats mettent l’accent sur les buts fonctionnels et opérationnels qui permettent de soutenir les buts de niveau motivationnel.

College teachers share with educational institutions the responsibility for their professional development. This article deals with the co-design of a digital platform supporting teachers’ agency in the context of their professional development. The co-design process included the identification of barriers to professional development, as well as the identification of goals at the motivational level. Results emphasize the functional and operational goals supporting motivational goals.

References

Allaire, S. (2008). Soutenir le cheminement de stage d’apprentis enseignants au secondaire par un environnement d’apprentissage hybride. Revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 34(2). doi:10.21432/T2P307

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy : The Exercise of Control. New York, NY : Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1 26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bødker, K., Kensing, F. et Simonsen, J. (2004). Participatory IT Design. Designing for Business and Workplace Re-alities. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Brennan, K. (2012). Best of both worlds: Issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school (Ph.D. Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Repéré à https://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/critique/Brennan_Proposal.pdf

Carver, C. S. et Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. Dans M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich et M. Zeidner (dir.), Handbook of self-regulation (p. 41-84). San Diego, CA : Elsevier Academic Press.

Clement, M. et Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers’ professional development: a solitary or collegial (ad)venture?, Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 81-101. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00051-7

Collins, A., Joseph, D. et Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2.

Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S. et Firth, A. (2005). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning?, Research Evidence in Education Library. Retrieved from https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=136

Cosnefroy, L. (2011). L’apprentissage autorégulé : entre cognition et motivation. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. et Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA : Learning Policy Institute.

Day, C. (1999). Developing Teachers: The Challenges of Lifelong Learning, London, Royaume Uni : Falmer Press.

Deschênes, M. (2018). Favoriser le développement professionnel des professeurs du collégial : pistes de réflexion issues de la recherche, Pédagogie collégiale, 28(2), 5-11. Retrieved from http://www.aqpc.qc.ca/revue/article/favoriser-developpement-professionnel-des-professeurs-collegial-pistes-reflexion

Donnay, J. et Charlier, É. (2008). Apprendre par l’analyse de pratiques : initiation au compagnonnage réflexif, Namur, Belgique : Presses universitaires de Namur.

Dorais, S. et Laliberté, J. (1999). Un profil de compétences du personnel enseignant du collégial, Pédagogie collégiale, 12(3), 8-13. Repéré à http://aqpc.qc.ca/sites/default/files/revue/performa_12_3.pdf

Eccles, J. S. et Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002

Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2013). La volition et l’agentivité transformatrice : perspective théorique de l’activité. Revue internationale du CRIRES: innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 1(1), p. 4-19. Repéré à https://ojs.crires.ulaval.ca/index.php/ric/article/view/7/7

Forlizzi, J. et Battarbee, K. (2004, aout). Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS 04): processes, practices, methods, and techniques, 261 268). New York, NY : ACM. doi:10.1145/1013115.1013152

Hadar, L. et Brody, D. (2010). From isolation to symphonic harmony: Building a professional development community among teacher educator, Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, p. 1641-1651. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.015

Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. Dans M.Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk et P. C. Wright (dir.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment (p. 31 42). Dordrecht, Pays-Bas : Kluwer.

Hassenzahl, M. (2008, septembre). User Experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the 20th French-speaking conference on Human-computer interaction, 11 15. doi:10.1145/1512714.1512717

Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience design: Technology for all the right reasons. Dans J. M. Carroll (dir.), Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics. San Rafael, CA : Morgan & Claypool.

Hassenzahl, M. et Tractinsky,N. (2006). User experience – a research agenda. Behavior & Information Technology, 25, 91 97. doi:10.1080/01449290500330331

Järvelä, S. et Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL, Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25-39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006

Jézégou, A. (2014). L’agentivité humaine : un moteur essentiel pour l’élaboration d’un environnement personnel d’apprentissage. Sticef, 21, 239-286. doi:10.3406/stice.2014.1099

Johnson, M. P., Ballie, J., Thorup, T., Brooks, E. et Brooks, E. (2017). CO/DEsign: building a shared dialogue around analysis within codesign. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4241-S4252. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352922

Jungk, R. et Mullert, N. (1987). Future workshops: How to create a desirable future. London, Royaume Uni : Institute of Social Invention.

Keiny, S. (1996). A community of learners: promoting teachers to become learners, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(2), 243-272. doi:10.1080/1354060960020206

Kensing, F. et Greenbaum, J. (2013). Heritage: having a say. Dans J. Simonsen et T. Robertson (dir.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design (p. 21-36). New York, NY : Routledge.

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning. New York, NY : Association Press.

Mandeville, L. (2001). Apprendre par l’expérience : un modèle de formation continue. Dans D. Raymond (dir.), Nouveaux espaces de développement professionnel et organisationnel (p. 151-164). Sherbrooke, QC : Éditions du CRP.

Muller, M. J. et Druin, A. (2012). Participatory design: the third space in HCI. Dans J. A. Jacko (dir.), Human-computer interaction Handbook (3e éd., p. 1125-1155). Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press.

Penuel, W. R., Tatar, D. et Roschelle, J. (2004). The role of research on contexts of teaching practice in informing the design of handheld learning technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 353–370. doi:10.2190/FJ51-5W3V-GGMC-4A92

Sanders, E. B.-N. (2002). From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches. Dans J. Frascara (Dir.), Design and the social sciences: Making connections (p. 1-8). New York, NY : Taylor & Francis. Repéré à http://maketools.com/articles-papers/FromUsercenteredtoParticipatory_Sanders_%2002.pdf

Sanders, E. B.-N., Brandt, E. et Binder, T. (2010, novembre). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on, 195-198. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900476

Sanders, E. B.-N. et Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5 18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068

Schuler, D. et Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T. et Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531-564. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541

Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163-174. Repéré à http://www.jstor.org/stable/43089196

Uwamariya, A. et Mukamureja, J. (2005). Le concept de “développement professionnel” en enseignement : approches théoriques, Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 31(1), 133-155. doi:10.7202/012361ar

Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T. et McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259-282. doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7

Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K. et Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative health research, 11(4), 522-537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299

Published
2019-04-18
Section
Articles