Online Learning: Practices, Perceptions, and Technology

Authors

  • Tess Miller University of Prince Edward Island
  • Kendra MacLaren University of Prince Edward Island
  • Han Xu University of Prince Edward Island

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27894

Keywords:

online learning, synchronous, asynchronous, learning management system, community of inquiry framework, COI

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine factors influencing online learning given its rapid growth combined with the necessity to reduce attrition in online classes by providing quality instruction. This study was contextualized using the three elements of the community of inquiry (CoI) framework. We surveyed 93 students currently registered in online classes about their online learning experiences, perceptions, technological delivery of their course. Findings revealed that the majority of online courses were asynchronous using Moodle. There was a statistically significant difference between the three CoI dimensions and level of education where graduate students had more favourable online learning experience as measured by the CoI survey.

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive, and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3–22. doi:10.24059/olj.v12i3.66

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40–56. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Díaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., Shea, P., & Swan, K. P. (n.d.). Community of inquiry survey instrument (draft v14). Retrieved from https://coi.athabascau.ca/coi-model/coi-survey/

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Díaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Artino, J. A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001

Bartolic-Zlomislic, S., & Bates, A. W. (1999). Investing in online learning: Potential benefits and limitations. Canadian Journal of Communication, 24(3). doi:10.22230/cjc.1999v24n3a1111

Bates, T. (2018). The 2017 national survey of online learning in Canadian post-secondary education: Methodology and results. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17. doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0112-3

Capra, T. (2011). Online education: Promise and problems. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning, 7(2), 288–293.

Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 Years of the Community of Inquiry Framework. TechTrends, (2020)64, 557–560. doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7

Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48–69. doi:10.24059/olj.v19i3.668

Columb, M., & Atkinson M. (2016). Statistical analysis: Sample size and power estimations. BJA Education, 16(5), 159–161. doi:10.1093/bjaed/mkv034

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.561

Driscoll, D. L., & Brizee, A. (2010). Creating good interview and survey questions. Purdue Online Writing Lab. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/conducting_primary_research/interview_and_survey_questions.html

Foronda, C., & Lippincott, C. (2014). Graduate nursing students' experience with synchronous, interactive videoconferencing within online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(2), 1–8. https://search.proquest.com/openview/d033e449708452e7a8040b62e87555eb/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=29705

Garrison, D. R. (2019). Understanding CoI presences. The Community of Inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial23

Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105.

Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31–36. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002

Goralski, M. A., & Falk, L. K. (2017). Online vs brick and mortar learning: Competition or complementary. Competition Forum, 15(2), 271–277.

Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42.

Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Ickes, M. J., Brown, J. E., Reeves, B., & Zephyr, P. M. D. (2015). Differences between undergraduate and graduate students in stress and coping strategies. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 13(1), 13–25. doi:10.32398/cjhp.v13i1.1810

Jean-Louis, M. (2015). An overview of online learning in Canada. Greater Sudbury, ON: Contact North.

Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005

Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student perceptions of group work in an online course: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 23(2), 69–92.

Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., Cukic, I., de Vries, P., Hatala, M., Dawson, S., Siemens, G., & Gasevic, D. (2018). Exploring communities of inquiry in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 119, 44–58.

Kozan, K. & Richardson, J. C. (2014). New exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis insights into the community of inquiry survey. Internet and Higher Education, 23, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007

Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196–216. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455

Lee, S. (2014). The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.002

Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020, April 29). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever: This is how. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/

Long, P. D. (2004). Learning management systems (LMS). In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. J. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 291–293). doi:10.4135/9781412950596.n99

Lowenthal, P. R., & Parscal, T. (2008). Teaching presence. The Learning Curve, 3(4), 1–4.

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Molnar, A. L., & Kearney, R. C. (2017). A comparison of cognitive presence in asynchronous and synchronous discussions in an online dental hygiene course. American Dental Hygienists’ Association, 91(3), 14–21.

Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269

Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta-and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34(2), 257–271.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Olpak, Y. Z., & Cakmak, E. K. (2018). Examining the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the community of inquiry survey. Online Learning, 22(1), 147–161. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.990

Oztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of research. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/32440/1/Social%20Presence%20and%20Online%20Learning.pdf

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Maidenhead, New York: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill. doi:10.4324/9781003117452

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed). Thousand Creeks, CA: Sage.

Pektas, S. T., & Gürel, M. Ö. (2014). Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students' experiences within the disciplinary differences framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 31–44. doi:10.14742/ajet.372

Peneva, J., & Keremedchiev, D. (2016). Teachers’ presence and immediacy in e-learning classes. Proceedings of the National Conference on Education and Research in the Information Society, 73–77.

Pool, J., Reitsma, G., & van den Berg, D. (2017). Revised community of inquiry framework: Examining learning presence in a blended mode of delivery. Online Learning, 21(3), 153–165. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i3.866

Preisman, K. (2014). Teaching presence in online education: From the instructor’s point of view. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 18(3). doi:10.24059/olj.v18i3.446

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Wendt, J., Wighting, M., & Nisbet, D. (2016). The predictive relationship among the community of inquiry framework, perceived learning and online, and graduate students’ course grades in online synchronous and asynchronous courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 18–34. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2203

Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002

Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., & Avgerinou, M. D. (2013). The effects of technology on the community of inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education. 17(1), 45–57. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.006

Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students' perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216–223.

Seckman, C. (2018). Impact of interactive video communication versus text-based feedback on teaching, social, and cognitive presence in online learning communities. Nurse Educator, 43(1), 18–22. doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000448

Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online learning courses. Distance Education Report, 15(3), 6–8.

Skramstad, E., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2012). Teaching presence and communication timeliness in asynchronous online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(3), 183–188.

Stenbom, S., Jansson, M., & Hulkko, A. (2016). Revising the community of inquiry framework for the analysis of one-to-one online learning relationships. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2068

Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x

Szeto, E. (2015). Community of inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers and Education, 81, 191–201. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.), Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Tsai, C. (2007). The preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments among university students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 16–31. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.12.002

Tuckman, B. W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 49(2), 414–422. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.002

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind and Society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Reprinted from Readings on the Development of Children, pp. 29–36, by M. Gauvain & M. Cole, Eds., 1997, New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.). doi.:10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.11

Zhu, X. (2018). Facilitating effective online discourse: Investigating factors influencing students’ cognitive presence in online learning (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2407&context=gs_theses

Downloads

Published

2020-09-11