Online Teacher Professional Development in Canada: A Review of the Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27948Keywords:
online learning, teacher professional development, reviewAbstract
This paper presents findings from a systematic review of 11 studies examining online teacher professional development (oTPD) in Canada between 2000-2020. A thematic content analysis of the articles led to four main themes associated with research on oTPD: 1. knowledge exchange; 2. reflective practice; 3. multifaceted learning opportunities; and 4. just-in-time support. The study contexts, research methods, and other relevant study characteristics are also reviewed and discussed. The results shed light on the current research trends on oTPD in Canada and highlight the need for continued research in this area. Data from diverse research methods across Canada’s geographical regions can contribute to greater insight into the types of oTPD occurring in Canada and how various platforms and professional development opportunities can best support teachers’ professional learning.
References
Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. https://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Rama/TALIS_2018_Framework.pdf
Anwaruddin, S. M. (2015). Teacher professional learning in online communities: Toward existentially reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 16(6), 806-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1095730
Armstrong, K., & Manson, M. (2010). What is lost and what remains: An exploration of the pedagogical challenges of online discussions in two online teacher education learning communities. Language and Literacy, 12(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.20360/g2bc71
Beach, P. (2017). Self-directed online learning: A theoretical model for understanding elementary teachers' online learning experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.007
Beach, P. (2018). Examining elementary teachers’ use of online learning environments: An exploratory study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(1), 24-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1383216
Beach, P., & Willows, D. (2014). Investigating teachers’ exploration of a professional development website: An innovative approach to understanding the factors that motivate teachers to use Internet-based resources. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2RP47
Callanan, M., Cervantes, C., & Loomis, M. (2011). Informal learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 646-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.143
Campbell, C., Osmond-Johnson, P., Faubert, B., Zeichner, K., & Hobbs-Johnson, A. (with Brown, S., DaCosta, P., Hales, A., Kuehn, L., Sohn, J., & Steffensen, K.). (2017). The state of educators’ professional learning in Canada. Learning Forward.
Canadian Teachers’ Federation. (2014). Highlights of CTF survey on the quest for teacher work-life balance. Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707-728.
Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2015). Blogging to enhance in-service teachers’ professional learning and development during collaborative inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 883-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9404-7
Dalgarno, N., & Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1051-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.037
Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Teaching as a profession: Lessons in teacher preparation and professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(3), 237-240.
Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2005). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08331140
Elliott, J. C. (2017). The Evolution from traditional to online professional development: A review. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(3), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1305304
Francis, K., & Jacobsen, M. (2013). Synchronous online collaborative professional development for elementary mathematics teachers. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1460
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
Greenhalgh, S. P., & Koehler, M. J. (2017). 28 days later: Twitter hashtags as “just in time” teacher professional development. TechTrends 61(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0142-4
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Hamel, C., Allaire, S., & Turcotte, S. (2012). Just-in-time online professional development activities for an innovation in small rural schools. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2988K
Katz, S., & Dack, L. A. (2016). The learning conversations protocol: An intentional interruption strategy for enhanced collaborative learning. Capacity Building: Ontario Ministry of Education. https://thelearningexchange.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/learning_conversations-1.pdf
Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111-1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864
Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008
Learning Forward. (2017). Standards for professional learning. https://learningforward.org/standards/resources
Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307.
Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., Van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art–teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Ostashewski, N. M., Reid, D., & Moisey, S. (2011). Applying constructionist principles to online teacher professional development. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.976
Parsons, S. A., Hutchison, A. C., Hall, L. A., Parsons, A. W., Ives, S. T., & Leggett, A. B. (2019). US teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 82(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better:” Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
Zhou, G., Varnhagen, S., Sears, M., Kasprzak, S., & Shervey, G. (2007). Online professional development for inservice teachers in Information and Communication Technology: Potentials and challenges. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T28P4W
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Pamela Beach, Elena Favret, Alexandra Minuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.