What Is a Digital Electronic Portfolio in Teacher Education? A Case Study of Instructors’ and Students’ Enabling Insights on the Electronic Portfolio Process | Qu'est-ce qu'un portfolio numérique dans la formation des enseignants? Étude de cas sur les perspectives d’enseignants et d’étudiants concernant le processus du portfolio numérique.

Auteurs-es

  • Timothy Frank Hopper University of Victoria
  • Hong Fu University of Victoria
  • Katherine Sanford University of Victoria
  • David Monk University of Victoria

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27634

Mots-clés :

ePortfolio, digital portfolio, complexity theory, constructivism

Résumé

Professional programs in postsecondary education have long been using electronic portfolios (ePs) for diverse purposes, for example, assessment, certification, showcasing, and learning. However, in our practices of using ePs in teacher education for the past several years, we have found that the question of “what is an eP?” requires substantial unpacking. This paper will offer insights on our evolving understanding on ePs in teacher education based on three interacting areas: (a) rich media reframing how we understand professional learning in a digitally linked world; (b) literature from the last 10 years in the use of ePs; and (c) insights from instructors and students using an eP process in one term of a teacher education program. We conclude with a re-visioning of learning in teacher education in relation to the emerging practices enabled by an eP process.

Les programmes professionnels d’éducation supérieure utilisent depuis longtemps des portfolios numériques à des fins diverses, comme l’évaluation, la certification, la mise en valeur et l’apprentissage. Cependant, notre expérience des dernières années relative à l’utilisation des portfolios numériques dans la formation des enseignants révèle que la définition du portfolio numérique nécessite un examen approfondi. Le présent article offre un aperçu de notre conception, toujours en évolution, des portfolios numériques dans la formation des enseignants, basée sur trois domaines en interaction: (a) des contenus médiatiques riches qui restructurent la manière dont nous comprenons l’apprentissage professionnel dans un monde interconnecté par le numérique; (b) la littérature des dix dernières années sur l'utilisation des portfolios numériques; et (c) les perspectives d’instructeurs et d’étudiants ayant utilisé des portfolios numériques durant un trimestre d'un programme de formation des enseignants. En conclusion, nous réimaginons l'apprentissage dans la formation des enseignants en tenant compte des pratiques émergentes rendues possibles par les portfolios numériques.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Timothy Frank Hopper, University of Victoria

Dr. Tim Hopper is an associate professor in the School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, Faculty of Education. His scholarly work focuses on teacher education, physical education and complexity theory. He is currently involved in SSHRC funded research grants (1) Electronic-portfolio development in professional programs.

Références

Abrami, P., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26487/19669

Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The reflect initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449. doi:org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2

Barrett, H., & Wilkerson, J. (2004). Conflicting paradigms in electronic portfolio approaches: Choosing an electronic portfolio strategy that matches your conceptual framework. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.org/systems/paradigms.html

Bryant, L., & Chittum, J. (2013). EPortfolio effectiveness: A(n ill-fated) search for empirical support. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 189-198. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107810

Butler, P. (2006). A review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios. Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/group/2518/article/1277760

Cambridge, D. (2007). Audience, integrity, and the living document: eFolio Minnesota and lifelong and lifewide learning with ePortfolios. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1227-1246. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.010

Capra, F., & Luigi, P. L., (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511895555

Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between students’ self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9-15. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.005

Chrzaszcz, A., Sporer, T., Metscher, J., Wild, F., & Sigurðarson, S. (2008). Distributed e-Portfolios to recognise informal learning. In J. Luca & E. R. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 5830-5838). Vienna, Austria: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/29191

Clark, J. E. (2010). The digital imperative: Making the case for a 21st-Century pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 27-35. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.12.004

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962

Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. London, United Kingdom: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ehiyazaryan-White, E. (2012). The dialogic potential of ePortfolios: Formative feedback and communities of learning within a personal learning environment. International Journal of ePortfolio. 2(2), 173-185. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107620

Fitch, D., Peet, M., Reed, B. G., & Tolman, R. (2008). The use of ePortfolios in evaluating the curriculum and student learning. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(3), 37-54. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700010

Gough, N. (2011). A complexivist view of higher education: Implications for curriculum design and research on teaching and learning. In Invited keynote address at the 5th Annual University Teaching and Learning Conference. University of KwaZulu-Natal. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Noel_Gough/publication/274375252_A_complexivist_view_of_higher_education_implications_for_curriculum_design_and_research_on_teaching_and_learning/links/560ca73c08ae6c9b0c42cc4e/A-complexivist-view-of-higher-education-implications-for-curriculum-design-and-research-on-teaching-and-learning.pdf

Graves, N., & Epstein, M. (2011). Eportfolio: A tool for constructing a narrative professional identity. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(3), 342-346. doi:10.1177/1080569911414555

Hoban, G. F. (2002). Designing a professional learning system. In Teacher learning for educational change: A systems thinking approach (pp. 162-174). London, United Kingdom: Open University Press.

Hopper, T., & Sanford, K. (2010). Program-wide E-portfolios: Creating new spaces for an “inside-out” approach to teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, Special Online Edition. Retrieved from http://www.teqjournal.org/hopper.html

Hopper, T., Sanford, K., & Bonsor-Kurki, S. (2012). Stitching together a teacher’s body of knowledge: Frankie N. Stein’s ePortfolio. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(1), 29-42. Retrieved from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/rss/abstract.asp?j=elea&aid=4883

Hopper, T., Sanford, K., & Fu, H. (2016). Finding the connective tissue in teacher education: Creating new spaces for professional learning to teach. McGill Journal of Education, 51(3), 1013-1036. Retrieved from http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/9379/7163

Hughes, J., & Purnell, E. (2008). Blogging for beginners? Using blogs and eportfolios in Teacher Education. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, T. Kargidis, D. McConnell, S. Retalis, D. Stamatis, & M. Zenios (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 144-153). Halkidiki, Greece. Retrieved from http://newdemo.openrepository.com/newdemo/handle/2384/294674

Johnsen, H. (2012). Making learning visible with ePortfolios: Coupling the right pedagogy with the right technology. International Journal of Eportfolio, 2(2), 139-148. Retrieved from http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP84.pdf

Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5577cb2ae4b049f9488d4c04/t/56377916e4b0683b6c590a88/1446476054898/johnson_2001.pdf

Karsenti, T., Dumouchel, G., & Collin, S. (2014). The eportfolio as support for the professional development of preservice teacher: A theoretical and practical overview. International Journal of Computers and Technology, 12(5), 3486-3495. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5903556/The_eportfolio_as_support_for_the_professional_development_of_preservice_teachers_A_theoretical_and_practical_view

Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers’ learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.002

Lopez-Fernandez, O., & Rodriguez-Illera, J. L. (2009). Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education, 52(3), 608-616. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/66898/

Masters, J. (2013). Scaffolding pre-service teachers representing their learning journeys with eportfolios. Journal of Learning Design, 6(1), 1-9. doi:10.5204/jld.v6i1.115

McWhorter, R. R., Delello, J. A., & Roberts, P. B. (2013). A cross-case analysis of the use of web-based ePortfolios in higher education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 253–286. Retrieved from http://www.jite.informingscience.org/documents/Vol12/JITEv12IIPp253-286McWhorter1238.pdf

Meek, J. A., Riner, M. E., Pesut, D., Runshe, D., & Allam, E. (2013). A pilot study evaluation of student reflective thinking in a doctor of nursing practice program. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(8), 82–91. doi:10.5430/jnep.v3n8p82

NVivo. (2016). Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10. Retrieved from https://www.qsrinternational.com/

Paulson, F. L., & Paulson, P. R. (1994, April). Assessing portfolios using the constructivist paradigm. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED376209.pdf)

Panke, S. (2014, October). E-Portfolios in higher education settings: A literature review. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1530-1539). New Orleans, LA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Russell, T., & Martin, A. (2016). Exploring the complex concept of quality in teacher education. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International Handbook of Teacher Education (pp. 143–180). Singapore: Stringer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0369-1_5

Sanford, K., Hopper, T., & Starr, L. (2015). Transforming teacher education thinking: Complexity and relational ways of knowing. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(2), 26-48. Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/complicity/index.php/complicity/article/view/23817

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 2(1), 3-10. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5a6/d010046e4da2ef00e59730633ec0422b236b.pdf

Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company. Inc.

Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2011). Electronic portfolios in teacher education: Forging a middle ground. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 161-173. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782584

Thomas, M., & Liu, K. (2012). The performance of reflection: A grounded analysis of prospective teachers’ ePortfolios. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 305–330. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/38513?nl

Trevitt, C., Macduff, A., & Steed, A. (2014). [e]portfolios for learning and as evidence of achievement: Scoping the academic practice development agenda ahead. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 69-78. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.001

Wakimoto, D. K. & Lewis, R. E. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of eportfolios: Uses for reflection, development, and assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 53-58. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.01.002

Walker, N., Hopper, T., Fu, H., & Sanford, K. (2017). A roadmap to digital ePortfolio proficiency: Creating the conditions for cross-course, cross-program and cross-life professional learning. The AAEEBL ePortfolio Review, 1(2), 58-72. Retrieved from http://www.aaeebl.org/resource/resmgr/aepr_/AePR_v1n2.pdf

Yancey, K. B. (2013). Postmodernism, palimpsest, and portfolios: Theoretical issues in the representation of student work. In K. V. Wills & R. Rice (Eds.), EPortfolio Performance Support Systems (pp. 15-35). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.

Zhang, X., Olfman, L., & Firpo, D. (2010). Supporting social constructivist learning through the KEEP SLS ePortfolio System. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(3), 411-426. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/28265

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2018-09-26

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles