A Framework for Ethical Online Course Development with Universal Design for Learning

Lorelei Anselmo; Sarah Elaine Eaton

doi:10.21432/cjlt28960

Authors

Lorelei Anselmo University of Calgary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-1227
Sarah Elaine Eaton University of Calgary https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0607-6287

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28960

Keywords:

academic integrity, blended learning, equity, inclusion, online, teaching, universal design for learning

Abstract

Postsecondary institutions increasingly recognize the importance of designing educational experiences that reflect students' diverse identities and life experiences. As online course enrollment continues to rise, it becomes crucial to address how course design can effectively support this diverse student population. Traditional course designs often fail to accommodate the broad spectrum of student backgrounds, resulting in barriers to success and inclusion. In response to this gap, we propose a framework for online course design that prioritizes inclusivity, flexibility, and ethical considerations. This three-layer framework systematically integrates Universal Design for Learning principles with academic integrity values and Indigenous academic integrity principles, providing educators with practical guidance to create ethical and supportive online learning environments that address learner agency while maintaining academic standards.

Author Biographies

Lorelei Anselmo, University of Calgary

Lorelei Anselmo, MEd, is the Teaching Supports Team Lead at the Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning at the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada. Her areas of interest include online and in-person course design and academic integrity in higher education. Email: lanselmo@ucalgary.ca ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-1227

Sarah Elaine Eaton, University of Calgary

Sarah Elaine Eaton is Professor in the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada. Her research focuses on ethics and integrity in higher education. Email: seaton@ucalgary.ca ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0607-6287

References

Anselmo, L., & Eaton, S. E. (2023, April 27). Transforming academic integrity course design from reactive to proactive. [Conference session]. Conference on Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1mJsLPcH6kw20EUueaYs1MkeDBZBZZSUs/edit?slide=id.p1#slide=id.p1

Basham, J. D., Blackorby, J., & Marino, M. T. (2020). Opportunity in Crisis: The Role of Universal Design for Learning in Educational Redesign. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 71–91. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1264277

Bertram Gallant, T. (2016). Leveraging institutional integrity for the betterment of education. In T. Bretag (Eds.), Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_52

Bretag, T. (2019). From ‘perplexities of plagiarism’ to ‘building cultures of integrity’: A reflection on fifteen years of academic integrity research, 2003-2018 (pp. 5–35). HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 6. https://herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-6/5-35

Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. (2024). 2024 Pan-Canadian Report on Digital Learning. https://cdlra-acrfl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024-Pan-Canadian-Report_EN.pdf

Celestini, A., & Palalas, A. (2024). Inclusive Online Nursing Education: Learner Perceptions of Universal Design for Learning Approaches. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.3.16911

Center for Applied Special Technology. (2025). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

Clark, A., Goodfellow, J., & Shoufani, S. (2020). Examining academic integrity using course-level outcomes. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.2.8508

Davis, M. (2022). Examining and improving inclusive practice in institutional academic integrity policies, procedures, teaching and support. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00108-x

Dwyer-Kuntz, T. (2022). UDL in online learning – One size doesn’t fit all. In R. Kay & B. Hunter (Eds.), Thriving online: A guide for busy educators. eCampusOntario. https://doi.org/10.51357/ghkl9022

Eaton, S. E. (2021). Communities of Integrity: Engaging Ethically Online for Teaching, Learning, and Research [Closing keynote address]. European Conference on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism, Online. https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38918

Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a Community of Inquiry in Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985

Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y

Gladue, K. (2020). Indigenous Academic Integrity. Taylor Institute of Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/Content/Resources/Academic-Integrity/21-TAY-Indigenous-Academic-Integrity.pdf

Gutiérrez, J. D. (2023). Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Courses. Universidad del Rosario. https://forogpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/guidelines-for-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-university-courses-v4.3.pdf

Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an Indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1A), 1–16. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jisd/article/view/63043

International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI). (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.).

Kenny, N., & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Academic Integrity Through a SoTL Lens and 4M Framework: An Institutional Self-Study. In S. E. Eaton & J. Christensen Hughes (Eds.), Academic Integrity in Canada: An enduring and essential challenge (pp. 573–592). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1

Lindstrom, G. (2022). Ethical space of engagement in curriculum development processes: Indigenous guiding principles for curriculum development projects. Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/resources/indigenous-guiding-principles-for-curriculum-development-projects

Poitras Pratt, Y., & Gladue, K. (2022). Re-defining academic integrity: Embracing Indigenous truths. In S. E. Easton, J. Christensen Hughes. (Eds.). Academic Integrity in Canada. Ethics and Integrity in Educational Contexts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_5

Rao, K. (2019). Instructional design with UDL: Addressing learner variability in college courses. In S. Bracken, & K. Novak. (Eds.). Transforming higher education through universal design for learning: An international perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351132077

Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive instructional design: Applying UDL to online learning. https://edtecharchives.org/journal/223/3753

Rao, K. & Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688

Rose, D. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, (15)4, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500407

Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal Design for Learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677

Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE Model and Universal Design for Learning Principles to Develop an Open Online Course for Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1494521

Usher, A. (2021). The State of Postsecondary Education in Canada, 2021. Toronto: Higher Education Strategy Associates. https://higheredstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/HESA_SPEC_2021.pdf

Wenzel, A., & Moreno, J. (2022). Designing and Facilitating Optimal LMS Student Learning Experiences: Considering students’ needs for accessibility, navigability, personalization, and relevance in their online courses. The Northwest eLearning Journal, 2(1). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/nwelearn.2.1.5642

Zhu, M., Berri, S., Koda, R., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring students’ self-directed learning strategies and satisfaction in online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2787–2803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11914-2