Critical Thinking in Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Systematic Review | La pensée critique dans les discussions asynchrones en ligne : examen systématique
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27782Mots-clés :
critical thinking, cognitive presence, online learning, asynchronous online discussions, higher educationRésumé
Enhancing critical thinking is a common goal of higher education. Designing and facilitating learning environments in which critical thinking may develop is a key responsibility for instructors. In this paper, we seek to inform future research and practice by investigating instructional strategies that could be used to promote critical and reflective thinking in asynchronous online discussions. Our literature review was qualitative and systematic, and focused specifically on strategies that were effective in fully-online higher education contexts. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the findings and conclusions from the various studies into recurrent themes and sub-themes. The results of the analysis indicated that practitioners should employ a multi-step approach to facilitating critical thinking and reflection in asynchronous online discussions. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Améliorer la pensée critique est un objectif courant de l’éducation supérieure. Concevoir et faciliter des environnements d’apprentissage dans lesquels la pensée critique peut se développer est une responsabilité importante pour les instructeurs. Dans cet article, nous cherchons à renseigner les études et les pratiques futures en examinant les stratégies didactiques qui pourraient être utilisées pour promouvoir une pensée critique et réfléchie dans les discussions asynchrones en ligne. Notre examen des publications a été qualitatif et systématique. Il a été particulièrement axé sur les stratégies qui étaient efficaces dans les contextes d’éducation supérieure entièrement en ligne. L’analyse thématique a servi à synthétiser les résultats et les conclusions des différentes études en thèmes et thèmes sous-jacents récurrents. Les résultats de l’analyse indiquent que les intervenants devraient se servir d’une approche en plusieurs étapes pour promouvoir la pensée critique et réfléchie dans les discussions asynchrones en ligne. Une discussion de ce que cela implique pour les recherches et la mise en pratique est incluse.
Références
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1. Retrieved from: https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/725
Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59-59. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
Bearman, M., & Dawson, P. (2013). Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Medical Education, 47(3), 252-260. doi:10.1111/medu.12092
Bearman, M., Smith, C. D., Carbone, A., Slade, S., Baik, C., Hughes-Warrington, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2012). Systematic review methodology in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 625-640. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.702735
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. In B. Bloom (Ed.), Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breivik, J. (2016). Critical thinking in online educational discussions measured as progress through inquiry phases: A discussion of the cognitive presence construct in the community of inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 32(1), 1. Retrieved from: https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/10768
Buraphadeja, V., & Dawson, K. (2008). Content analysis in computer-mediated communication: Analyzing models for assessing critical thinking through the lens of social constructivism. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 1-28. doi:10.1080/08923640802224568
Cheong, C. M., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Online discussion and critical thinking skills: A case study in a Singapore secondary school. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 556-573. doi:10.1007/s12564-010-9101-5
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Cook, D. A., & West, C. P. (2012). Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: A stepwise approach. Medical Education, 46(10), 943-952. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04328.x
Curtis, J. N. (2006). Using online discussion forums to promote critical reflection among pre and in-service HIV/AIDS educators and service providers. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 9, 166-179. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ794135
Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216-227. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228-241. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.837651
Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Rand, A. D., Rogers, S. E., & Bendolph, A. L. (2016, June). Exploration of students’ social presence and discussion interaction patterns in online and blended course sections. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1032-1039). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173073/
De Leng, B.A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Jöbsis, B., Muijtjens, A. M. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2009). Exploration of an e-learning model to foster critical thinking on basic science concepts during work placements. Computers & Education, 53(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.012
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6-28. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
De Wever, B., Van Winckel, M., & Valcke, M. (2008). Discussing patient management online: The impact of roles on knowledge construction for students interning at the paediatric ward. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(1), 25-42. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9022-6
DeLotell, P. J., Millam, L. A., & Reinhardt, M. M. (2010). The use of deep learning strategies in online business courses to impact student retention. American Journal of Business Education, 3(12), 49-56. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1058303
DiPasquale, J. (2017). Transformative learning and critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: A systematic review (Unpublished master’s project). The University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada. Retrieved from: https://ir.library.dc-uoit.ca/handle/10155/891
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45-53. doi:10.1258/1355819052801804
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. doi:10.1080/08923640109527071
Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The internet and higher education, 24, 53-65. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.006
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17(4): 395-429. doi:10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
Hand, K. G. (2015). Descriptive post titles as advance organizer: Effects on critical thinking and cognitive load in asynchronous threaded discussions (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/4a4ddd218238470f42a22af671380d94/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y (Order No. 3705825)
Hemphill, L. S., & Hemphill, H. H. (2007). Evaluating the impact of guest speaker postings in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 287-293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00622.x
Hung, W., Flom, E., Manu, J., & Mahmoud, E. (2015). A review of the instructional practices for promoting online learning communities. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(3), 229-252. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130598/
Jeong, A. (2005). A guide to analyzing message-response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer-mediated communication. Distance Education, 26(3), 367-383. doi:10.1080/01587910500291470
Joiner, R., & Jones, S. (2003). The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 861-871. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.008
Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21-39. doi:10.1007/BF02940928
Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260-271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x
Kember, D. (1999). Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 18-30. doi:10.1080/026013799293928
Lee-Baldwin, J. (2005). Asynchronous discussion forums: A closer look at the structure, focus and group dynamics that facilitate reflective thinking. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 5(1), 93-115. Retrieved from: http://www.citejournal.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/04/v5i1currentpractice2.pdf
Liu, C., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Using the community of inquiry model to investigate students' knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 327-354. doi:10.2190/EC.51.3.d
Marra, R. (2006). A review of research methods for assessing computer-mediated discussion forums. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(3), 243-267. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/6290/
Maurino, P. S. M. (2007). Looking for critical thinking in online threaded discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 241-260. doi:10.2190/P4W3-8117-K32G-R34M
Morueta, R. T., López, P. M., Gómez, A. H., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.004
Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484-495. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q
Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 56–77. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/267e/42e7d3ec60d054ea9eebd50589512c3801d3.pdf
Ng, C. S. L., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Solving ill-structured problems in asynchronous online discussions: Built-in scaffolds vs. no scaffolds. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(2), 115-134. doi:10.1080/10494820802337629
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Oh, E. G., & Kim, H. S. (2016). Understanding cognitive engagement in online discussion: Use of a scaffolded, audio-based argumentation activity. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 28-48. Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2456
Olesova, L., & Lim, J. (2017). The impact of roles assignment on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussion. In P. Vu, S. Fredrickson, & C. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Innovative Pedagogies and Technologies for Online Learning in Higher Education (pp. 19-39). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from: https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/the-impact-of-role-assignment-on-cognitive-presence-in-asynchronous-online-discussion/174565
Park, C. L. (2009) Replicating the use of a cognitive presence measurement tool. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 140-155. Retrieved from: https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/2330
Rew, L. (2011). The systematic review of literature: Synthesizing evidence for practice. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 16(1), 64-69. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6155.2010.00270.x
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22. Retrieved from: https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197319/
Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2017). Enhancing cognitive presence in online case discussions with questions based on the practical inquiry model. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 56-12. doi:10.1080/08923647.2017.1267525
Schindler, L. A., & Burkholder, G. J. (2014). Instructional design and facilitation approaches that promote critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: A review of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(4), 11-29. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v4i4.222
Seers, K. (2012). What is a qualitative synthesis? Evidence Based Nursing, 15(4), 101-101. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2012-100977
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45-45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Trespalacios, J., & Rand, J. (2015). Using asynchronous activities to promote sense of community and learning in an online course. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 5(4), 1-13. Retrieved from: https://www.igi-global.com/article/using-asynchronous-activities-to-promote-sense-of-community-and-learning-in-an-online-course/129963
Tzelepi, M., Papanikolaou, K., Roussos, P., & Tsakiri, A. (2015, October). Promoting cognitive presence through asynchronous discussions on learning design tasks. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 682-688). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/152079/
Weltzer-Ward, L. (2011). Content analysis coding schemes for online asynchronous discussion. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(1), 56-74. doi:10.1108/10650741111097296
Yang, Y. C., Newby, T. J., & Bill, R. L. (2005). Using socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 163-181. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_4
Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538-551. doi:10.1111/bjet.12383
Zydney, J. M., deNoyelles, A., & Seo, K. K. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 58(1), 77-87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Joshua DiPasquale, William Hunter 2018
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Droits d’auteur
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.
