Création d'un apprentissage professionnel basé sur les STIAM : Une étude de recherche de quatre ans orientés par la conception

Auteurs-es

  • Janette Hughes Ontario Tech University
  • Laura Morrison Ontario Tech University
  • Jennifer Robb Ontario Tech University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27915

Mots-clés :

apprentissage professionnel des enseignants, makerspaces, pédagogies maker, recherche orientée par la conception, STIAM

Résumé

Cet article rapporte l'évolution d'un programme d'apprentissage professionnel des enseignants basé sur les STIAM et conçu pour se concentrer sur les pédagogies maker. La méthodologie de recherche orientée par la conception a été utilisée pour encadrer trois itérations de sessions d'apprentissage professionnel, qui ont impliqué collectivement plus de 85 personnes enseignantes en Ontario, Canada. L'article décrit les trois itérations de l'apprentissage professionnel des enseignants liées à une approche maker, rend compte de ce que nous avons appris de chaque itération et de la façon dont nous avons modifié l'approche pédagogique en fonction des résultats, et comprend une discussion sur les implications pour l'apprentissage professionnel futur dans l'enseignement maker.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Janette Hughes, Ontario Tech University

Janette Hughes is Professor and Canada Research Chair, in Technology and Pedagogy at Ontario Tech University. She is the recipient of multiple research and teaching awards. Janette is a prolific author and presenter, sharing her work both nationally and internationally in prestigious scholarly and professional journals, keynote talks, and conferences.

Laura Morrison, Ontario Tech University

Laura Morrison is a research project manager in the STEAM3D Maker Lab in the Faculty of Education at Ontario Tech University. Laura holds an Education Doctorate from the University of Calgary with a focus on promising practices associated with online pre-service teacher education.

Jennifer Robb, Ontario Tech University

Jennifer A. Robb holds a Master of Arts from Ontario Tech University’s Faculty of Education and is currently a research assistant with the STEAM-3D Maker Lab at Ontario Tech University. She is passionate about the role of technology to promote meaningful, authentic, and equitable education, which drives her work with learners of all ages.

Références

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1

Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6

Blackley, S., Sheffield, R., Maynard, N., Koul, R., & Walker, R. (2017). Makerspace and reflective practice: Advancing pre-service teachers in STEM education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.2

Bruner, J. (1994). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Kong, J. N. L., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347

Buxton, C. A., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Kayumova, S., Aghasaleh, R., Choi, Y.-J., & Cohen, A. (2015). Teacher agency and professional learning: Rethinking fidelity of implementation as multiplicities of enactment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21223

Calvert, L. (2016a). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/moving-from-compliance-to-agency.pdf

Calvert, L. (2016b). The power of teacher agency: Why we must transform professional learning so that it really supports educator learning. Journal of Staff Development, 37(2), 51–56. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/the-power-of-teacher-agency-april16.pdf

Campbell, C., Lieberman, A., & Yashkina, A. (2016). Developing professional capital in policy and practice: Ontario’s Teacher Learning and Leadership Program. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-03-2016-0004

Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., & Andree, A. (2010). How high-achieving countries develop great teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/how-high-achieving-countries-develop-great-teachers.pdf

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311.

Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. http://www.designbasedresearch.org/reppubs/DBRC2003.pdf

diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_4

Easton, L. B. (2008). From professional development to professional learning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 89(10), 755-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170808901014

Fazio, X., & Gallagher, T. L. (2018). Bridging professional teacher knowledge for science and literary integration via design-based research. Teacher Development, 22(2), 267-280, https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1363084

Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Harron, J. R., & Hughes, J. E. (2018). Spacemakers: A leadership perspective on curriculum and the purpose of K–12 educational makerspaces. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1461038

Hughes, J. (2017). Meaningful making: Establishing a makerspace in your school or classroom. What Works? Research into Practice. Ontario Ministry of Education. https://oere.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/meaningful_making_en.pdf

Hughes, J., & Burke, A. (2014). The Digital Principal. Pembroke Publishers Ltd.

Hughes, J., & Morrison, L. (2018). The use of e-textiles in Ontario education. Canadian Journal of Education, 41(1), 356-384. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/3237

Hughes, J., Morrison, L., Mamolo, A., Laffier, J., & de Castell, S. (2019). Addressing bullying through critical making. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12714

Hughes, J. M., Morrison, L. J., Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Makerspaces promoting students’ design thinking and collective knowledge creation: Examples from Canada and Finland. In A. Brooks, E. Brooks & C. Sylla (Eds.), Interactivity, game creation, design, learning, and innovation (pp. 343-352). 7th EAI International Conference, ArtsIT 2018, and 3rd EAI International Conference, DLI 2018, ICTCC 2018, Braga, Portugal, October 24–26, 2018, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/325565/Hughes_J_Morrison_J_Kajamaa_0_Kumpulainen_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Hultén, M., & Björkholm, E. (2016). Epistemic habits: primary school teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in a design-based research project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9320-5

Insulander, E., Brehmer, D., & Ryve, A. (2019). Teacher agency in professional development programmes – A case study of professional development material and collegial discussion. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100330

Kafai, Y. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412005281767

Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235-250. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13674580500200277

Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 336-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.929293

Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800

Kim, Y. E., Edouard, K., Alderfer, K., & Smith, B. K. (2018). Making culture: A national study of education makerspaces. Drexel University ExCITE Center. https://drexel.edu/~/media/Files/excite/making-culture-full-report.ashx?la=en

King, A., & Johnston, B. (2012). Engibear’s dream. Little Steps Publishing.

King, F. (2016). Teacher professional development to support teacher professional learning: Systemic factors from Irish case studies. Teacher Development, 20(4), 574-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1161661

Liao, Y-C., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Karlin, M., Glazewski, K., & Brush, T. (2017). Supporting change in teacher practice: Examining shifts of teachers’ professional development preferences and needs for technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 522-548. https://citejournal.org/volume-17/issue-4-17/general/supporting-change-in-teacher-practice-examining-shifts-of-teachers-professional-development-preferences-and-needs-for-technology-integration

Little, J. W. (1994). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Archive of the Second Annual Conference on Sustainability of Systemic Reform. TERC. https://sustainability2002.terc.edu/invoke/page/138.html

MacKenzie, T., & Bathurst-Hunt, R. (2019). Inquiry mindset: Nurturing the dreams, wonders, & curiosities of our youngest learners. Elevate Books EDU.

Marshall, J. A., & Harron, J. R. (2018). Making learners: A framework for evaluating making in STEM education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1749

Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

Noss, R., & Clayson, J. (2015). Reconstructing constructionism. Constructivist Foundations, 10(3), 285-288. http://www.kvccdocs.com/ss-department/psychology/constructionism/Noss.pdf

Oliver, K. M. (2016). Professional development considerations for makerspace leaders, part one: Addressing “what?” and “why?” TechTrends, 60(2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0028-5

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Towards defining 21st century competencies for Ontario: 21st century competencies foundation document for discussion. http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/About21stCentury/21CL_21stCenturyCompetencies.pdf

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert and I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Ablex Publishing.

Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2012). A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(1), 202-216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.35.1.202

Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Expansion of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9378-6

Sidorkin, A., & Warford, M. (2017). Reforms and innovation in education: Implications for the quality of human capital. Springer International Publishing.

Stevenson, M., Bower, M., Falloon, G., Forbes, A., & Hatzigianni, M. (2019). By design: Professional learning ecologies to develop primary school teachers’ makerspaces pedagogical capabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1260-1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12743

Stewart, C. (2014). Transforming professional development to professional learning. Journal of Adult Education, 43(1), 28-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1047338.pdf

Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010

Thumlert, K., de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2015). Short cuts and extended techniques: Rethinking relations between technology and educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(8), 786-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.901163

Wallen, M., & Tormey, R. (2019). Developing teacher agency through dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.014

Watt, J. G., & Colyer, J. (2014). IQ: A practical guide to inquiry-based learning. Oxford University Press.

Wiener, G. J., Schmeling, S. M., & Hopf, M. (2018). The technique of probing acceptance as a tool for teachers’ professional development: A PCK study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 849-875. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21442

Publié-e

2022-05-02

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles