Création d'un apprentissage professionnel basé sur les STIAM : Une étude de recherche de quatre ans orientés par la conception
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27915Mots-clés :
apprentissage professionnel des enseignants, makerspaces, pédagogies maker, recherche orientée par la conception, STIAMRésumé
Cet article rapporte l'évolution d'un programme d'apprentissage professionnel des enseignants basé sur les STIAM et conçu pour se concentrer sur les pédagogies maker. La méthodologie de recherche orientée par la conception a été utilisée pour encadrer trois itérations de sessions d'apprentissage professionnel, qui ont impliqué collectivement plus de 85 personnes enseignantes en Ontario, Canada. L'article décrit les trois itérations de l'apprentissage professionnel des enseignants liées à une approche maker, rend compte de ce que nous avons appris de chaque itération et de la façon dont nous avons modifié l'approche pédagogique en fonction des résultats, et comprend une discussion sur les implications pour l'apprentissage professionnel futur dans l'enseignement maker.
Références
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6
Blackley, S., Sheffield, R., Maynard, N., Koul, R., & Walker, R. (2017). Makerspace and reflective practice: Advancing pre-service teachers in STEM education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.2
Bruner, J. (1994). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Kong, J. N. L., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
Buxton, C. A., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Kayumova, S., Aghasaleh, R., Choi, Y.-J., & Cohen, A. (2015). Teacher agency and professional learning: Rethinking fidelity of implementation as multiplicities of enactment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21223
Calvert, L. (2016a). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/moving-from-compliance-to-agency.pdf
Calvert, L. (2016b). The power of teacher agency: Why we must transform professional learning so that it really supports educator learning. Journal of Staff Development, 37(2), 51–56. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/the-power-of-teacher-agency-april16.pdf
Campbell, C., Lieberman, A., & Yashkina, A. (2016). Developing professional capital in policy and practice: Ontario’s Teacher Learning and Leadership Program. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-03-2016-0004
Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., & Andree, A. (2010). How high-achieving countries develop great teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/how-high-achieving-countries-develop-great-teachers.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. http://www.designbasedresearch.org/reppubs/DBRC2003.pdf
diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_4
Easton, L. B. (2008). From professional development to professional learning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 89(10), 755-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170808901014
Fazio, X., & Gallagher, T. L. (2018). Bridging professional teacher knowledge for science and literary integration via design-based research. Teacher Development, 22(2), 267-280, https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1363084
Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Harron, J. R., & Hughes, J. E. (2018). Spacemakers: A leadership perspective on curriculum and the purpose of K–12 educational makerspaces. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1461038
Hughes, J. (2017). Meaningful making: Establishing a makerspace in your school or classroom. What Works? Research into Practice. Ontario Ministry of Education. https://oere.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/meaningful_making_en.pdf
Hughes, J., & Burke, A. (2014). The Digital Principal. Pembroke Publishers Ltd.
Hughes, J., & Morrison, L. (2018). The use of e-textiles in Ontario education. Canadian Journal of Education, 41(1), 356-384. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/3237
Hughes, J., Morrison, L., Mamolo, A., Laffier, J., & de Castell, S. (2019). Addressing bullying through critical making. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12714
Hughes, J. M., Morrison, L. J., Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Makerspaces promoting students’ design thinking and collective knowledge creation: Examples from Canada and Finland. In A. Brooks, E. Brooks & C. Sylla (Eds.), Interactivity, game creation, design, learning, and innovation (pp. 343-352). 7th EAI International Conference, ArtsIT 2018, and 3rd EAI International Conference, DLI 2018, ICTCC 2018, Braga, Portugal, October 24–26, 2018, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/325565/Hughes_J_Morrison_J_Kajamaa_0_Kumpulainen_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Hultén, M., & Björkholm, E. (2016). Epistemic habits: primary school teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in a design-based research project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9320-5
Insulander, E., Brehmer, D., & Ryve, A. (2019). Teacher agency in professional development programmes – A case study of professional development material and collegial discussion. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100330
Kafai, Y. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412005281767
Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235-250. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13674580500200277
Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 336-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.929293
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
Kim, Y. E., Edouard, K., Alderfer, K., & Smith, B. K. (2018). Making culture: A national study of education makerspaces. Drexel University ExCITE Center. https://drexel.edu/~/media/Files/excite/making-culture-full-report.ashx?la=en
King, A., & Johnston, B. (2012). Engibear’s dream. Little Steps Publishing.
King, F. (2016). Teacher professional development to support teacher professional learning: Systemic factors from Irish case studies. Teacher Development, 20(4), 574-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1161661
Liao, Y-C., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Karlin, M., Glazewski, K., & Brush, T. (2017). Supporting change in teacher practice: Examining shifts of teachers’ professional development preferences and needs for technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 522-548. https://citejournal.org/volume-17/issue-4-17/general/supporting-change-in-teacher-practice-examining-shifts-of-teachers-professional-development-preferences-and-needs-for-technology-integration
Little, J. W. (1994). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Archive of the Second Annual Conference on Sustainability of Systemic Reform. TERC. https://sustainability2002.terc.edu/invoke/page/138.html
MacKenzie, T., & Bathurst-Hunt, R. (2019). Inquiry mindset: Nurturing the dreams, wonders, & curiosities of our youngest learners. Elevate Books EDU.
Marshall, J. A., & Harron, J. R. (2018). Making learners: A framework for evaluating making in STEM education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1749
Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Noss, R., & Clayson, J. (2015). Reconstructing constructionism. Constructivist Foundations, 10(3), 285-288. http://www.kvccdocs.com/ss-department/psychology/constructionism/Noss.pdf
Oliver, K. M. (2016). Professional development considerations for makerspace leaders, part one: Addressing “what?” and “why?” TechTrends, 60(2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0028-5
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Towards defining 21st century competencies for Ontario: 21st century competencies foundation document for discussion. http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/About21stCentury/21CL_21stCenturyCompetencies.pdf
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert and I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Ablex Publishing.
Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2012). A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(1), 202-216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.35.1.202
Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Expansion of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9378-6
Sidorkin, A., & Warford, M. (2017). Reforms and innovation in education: Implications for the quality of human capital. Springer International Publishing.
Stevenson, M., Bower, M., Falloon, G., Forbes, A., & Hatzigianni, M. (2019). By design: Professional learning ecologies to develop primary school teachers’ makerspaces pedagogical capabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1260-1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12743
Stewart, C. (2014). Transforming professional development to professional learning. Journal of Adult Education, 43(1), 28-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1047338.pdf
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010
Thumlert, K., de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2015). Short cuts and extended techniques: Rethinking relations between technology and educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(8), 786-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.901163
Wallen, M., & Tormey, R. (2019). Developing teacher agency through dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.014
Watt, J. G., & Colyer, J. (2014). IQ: A practical guide to inquiry-based learning. Oxford University Press.
Wiener, G. J., Schmeling, S. M., & Hopf, M. (2018). The technique of probing acceptance as a tool for teachers’ professional development: A PCK study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 849-875. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21442
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Dr. Janette Hughes, Laura Morrison, Jennifer Robb 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Droits d’auteur
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.
