Concevoir la diffusion des connaissances à l'ère numérique - Analyse de l'orchestration multimodale de TED Talks
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28263Mots-clés :
apprentissage en ligne , TED Talks, analyse multimodale du discours , discours, image, gesteRésumé
L'apprentissage en ligne a fait l'objet d'une attention croissante pendant la pandémie de COVID‑19. Les enseignants sont confrontés à des exigences sociales pour concevoir des moyens de diffusion des connaissances dans l'enseignement en ligne. Nous postulons que la compréhension de la façon dont les connaissances peuvent être représentées dans des genres académiques en ligne réussis peut informer les enseignants sur la façon dont ils peuvent concevoir les expériences d'apprentissage en ligne des étudiants. Notre étude a examiné la manière dont les connaissances scientifiques sont diffusées dans l'un des genres académiques les plus répandus, les TED Talks, qui partagent des similitudes discursives avec d'autres genres académiques tels que les cours magistraux en ligne. Cette étude a adopté une approche systémique d'analyse fonctionnelle du discours multimodal pour explorer la manière dont un présentateur utilise la parole, les images et les gestes pour diffuser des connaissances. L'analyse montre qu'un présentateur orchestre la parole, les images et les gestes de manière stratégique afin de clarifier les idées scientifiques et d'impliquer le groupe. Sur la base de la compréhension de la façon dont les trois modes sémiotiques sont utilisés pour diffuser des connaissances scientifiques de manière accessible et engageante, cet article discute de la façon dont les idées sur l'orchestration multimodale peuvent fonctionner comme un outil heuristique pour informer la conception de l'apprentissage en ligne.Références
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Wolfgram, M. S., Church, R. B., Jacobs, S. A., Johnson Martinez, C., & Knuth, E. J. (2014). How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 65-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.858161
Allo, M. D. G. (2020). Is the online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1-10. https://sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/24
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 3-31). Athabasca University Press.
Bannert, M. (2002). Managing cognitive load—Recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 139-146. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00021-4
Bucchi, M., & Saracino, B. (2016). “Visual Science Literacy” images and public understanding of science in the digital age. Science Communication, 38(6), 812-819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016677833
Chang, Y.-J., & Huang, H.-T. (2015). Exploring TED Talks as a pedagogical resource for oral presentations: A corpus-based move analysis. English Teaching & Learning, 39(4), 29-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.6330/ETL.2015.39.4.02
Chue, S., Lee, Y.-J., & Tan, K. C. D. (2015). Iconic gestures as undervalued representations during science teaching. Cogent Education, 2(1), Article 1021554. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1021554
D’avanzo, S. (2015). Speaker identity vs. speaker diversity: The case of TED Talks corpus. In G. Balirano & M. C. Nisco (Eds.), Languaging diversity: Identities, genres, discourses (pp. 279-296). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Feng, D., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). The visual representation of metaphor: A social semiotic approach. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 11(2), 320-335. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.07fen
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Hamid, R., Sentryo, I., & Hasan, S. (2020). Online learning and its problems in the Covid-19 emergency period. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i1.32165
Harrison, C. (2003). Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Technical Communication, 50(1), 46-60.
Harrison, S. (2021). Showing as sense-making in oral presentations: The speech-gesture-slide interplay in TED Talks by Professor Brian Cox. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Article 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101002
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2020). After the COVID-19 crisis: Why higher education may (and perhaps should) never be the same. Access: Contemporary Issues in Education, 40(1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.46786/ac20.9496
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Li, Y., Gao, Y., & Zhang, D. (2016). To speak like a TED speaker—A case study of TED motivated English public speaking study in EFL teaching. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.5539/HES.V6N1P53
Lim, F. V. (2019). Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis approach. Social Semiotics, 29(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F10350330.2017.1412168
Lim, F. V. (2020). Designing learning with embodied teaching: Perspectives from multimodality. Routledge.
Lim, F. V. (2021). Investigating intersemiosis: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse. Visual Communication, 20(1), 34-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218820695
Lorés, R. (2020). Science on the web: The exploration of European research websites of energy-related projects as digital genres for the promotion of values. Discourse, Context & Media, 35, Article 100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100389
Maqableh, M., & Alia, M. (2021). Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 128, Article 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160
Martin, B. A. (2021). Teachers perceptions of Google Classroom: Revealing urgency for teacher professional learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27873
Martinec, R. (2000). Construction of identity in Michael Jackson’s Jam. Social Semiotics, 10(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330050136370
Masi, S. (2016). Gestures in motion in TED Talks: Towards multimodal literacy. In V. Bonsignori & B. C. Camiciottoli (Eds.), Multimodality Across Communicative Settings, Discourse Domains and Genres (pp. 146-165). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Masi, S. (2020). Exploring meaning-making practices via co-speech gestures in TED Talks. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39(3-4), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826223
Mattiello, E. (2019). A corpus-based analysis of scientific TED Talks: Explaining cancer-related topics to non-experts. Discourse, Context & Media, 28, 60-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.004
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4
Miller, T., MacLaren, K., & Xu, H. (2020). Online learning: Practices, perceptions, and technology. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27894
Niess, M. L. (2012). Teacher knowledge for teaching with technology: A TPACK lens. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & L. N. Margaret (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 1-15). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch001
Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., & Obi, C. A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1383
O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210
Oyedotun, T. D. (2020). Sudden change of pedagogy in education driven by COVID-19: Perspectives and evaluation from a developing country. Research in Globalization, 2, Article 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100029
Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), Article 1666538. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2012). Oralising text slides in scientific conference presentations: A multimodal corpus analysis. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP (pp. 135-166). John Benjamins.
Salem, A. A. (2019). A sage on a stage, to express and impress: TED Talks for improving oral presentation skills, vocabulary retention and its impact on reducing speaking anxiety in ESP settings. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.5539/ELT.V12N6P146
Shalev-Shwartz, S. (2011). Online learning and online convex optimization. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 4(2), 107-194. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000018
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.003
Tanis, C. J. (2020). The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28, Article 2319. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2319
Tardy, C. M. (2005). Expressions of disciplinarity and individuality in a multimodal genre. Computers and Composition, 22(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.05.004
Teo, C. L., Tan, S. C., & Chan, C. K. (2021). Pedagogical transformation and teacher learning for knowledge building: Turning COVID-19 challenges into opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28057
Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., & Yusuf, W. F. B. M. (2013). Squaring literacy assessment with multimodal design: An analytic case for semiotic awareness. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(4), 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X13504155
Valeiras-Jurado, J., Ruiz-Madrid, M. N., & Jacobs, G. (2018). Revisiting persuasion in oral academic and professional genres: Towards a methodological framework for multimodal discourse analysis of research dissemination talks. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), 35, 93-118.
Wingrove, P. (2017). How suitable are TED Talks for academic listening? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.010
Zhang, Y., Machin, D., & Song, T. (2015). Visual forms of address in social media discourse: The case of a science communication website. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(2), 236-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1042384
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Jingxin Jiang, Fei Victor Lim 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Droits d’auteur
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.
