Les portfolios numériques : une approche à 360 degrés de l’évaluation dans la formation des enseignants
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28579Mots-clés :
évaluation, portfolio numérique, apprentissage en ligne, formation des enseignantsRésumé
Les portfolios numériques sont de plus en plus utilisés pour enseigner, évaluer et faciliter l’apprentissage des étudiants dans l’enseignement supérieur. Lorsque la pandémie de COVID-19 a contraint de nombreux établissements d’enseignement supérieur à offrir leurs services éducatifs et leur enseignement en ligne, les portfolios numériques sont devenus essentiels dans le processus d’évaluation puisqu’ils étaient accessibles sur le Web. Cette étude de cas se penche sur la manière dont les portfolios numériques sont utilisés pour améliorer les pratiques d’évaluation dans le cadre de deux programmes de formation des enseignants, en Afrique du Sud et au Canada. Les données comprennent un dialogue à visée critique, des notes, des réflexions et des conversations avec des étudiants inscrits dans deux programmes de formation d’enseignants. Les résultats suggèrent que les étudiants utilisent les portfolios numériques pour intégrer leurs propres commentaires, ceux de leurs pairs et ceux des enseignants ou des experts. Il en résulte une approche à 360 degrés de l’évaluation.
Références
Adams, S., & Linschinger, N. (2019). The “multiplier effect” student e-tutors have on course instructors to incorporate technology in classrooms. Hosted by UNED, Madrid (Spain), 346. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/304335206.pdf#page=358
Alharahsheh, H. H., & Pius, A. (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39–43. https://gajrc.com/media/articles/GAJHSS_23_39-43_VMGJbOK.pdf
Allen, C. (2016). Alverno College: Lessons from an assessment pioneer. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/AlvernoCaseStudy.pdf
Biggs, J. (1998). Assumptions underlying new approaches to assessment. In P. Stimson & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum and assessment in Hong Kong: Two components, one system (pp. 351–384). Open University of Hong Kong Press.
Bjerke, M. B., & Renger, R. (2017). Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 61, 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.009
Blair, K. L. (2017). ePortfolio artifacts as graduate student multimodal identity assemblages. In K. B. Yancey & S. J. McElroy (Eds.), Assembling composition (pp. 120–139). Conference on College Composition and Communication of the National Council of Teachers of English.
Bodle, K. A., Malin, M., & Wynhoven, A. (2017). Students' experience toward ePortfolios as a reflective assessment tool in a dual mode indigenous business course. Accounting Research Journal, 30(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-06-2015-0089
Boud, D. J. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/csce20
Buchholtz, N. F., Krosanke, N., Orschulik, A. B., & Vorhölter, K. (2018). Combining and integrating formative and summative assessment in mathematics teacher education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50, 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0948-y
Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2004). Thinking about the thinking about self-study: An analysis of eight chapters. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, and T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 313–342). Kluwer Academic.
Cahill, A. S., Nelson, R. M, Strawhecker, J., & Vu, P. (2022). School administrators’ perceptions of electronic portfolios and the hiring of K-12 teachers. International Journal of ePortfolio, 12(1), 47–58. https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/IJEP/Article-PDFs/Vol-12-1/IJEP378_12-1_47-58.pdf
Calgary Board of Education. (2023). Iris: My learning plan. https://cbe.ab.ca/programs/technology-for-learning/Pages/default.aspx
Celik, B., & Yildiz, Y. (2017). Commitment to the teaching profession. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2), 93–97. https://ijsses.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/volume-4-issue-2-article-11/
Claypool, T. R., & Preston, J. P. (2011). Redefining learning and assessment practices impacting Aboriginal students: Considering Aboriginal priorities via Aboriginal and Western worldviews. Education, 17(3), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/e683152011-019
Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning. Athabasca University Press. https://www.aupress.ca/books/120279-assessment-strategies-for-online-learning/
Corley, C. R., & Zubizarreta, J. (2012). The power and utility of reflective learning portfolios in honors. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 13(1), 63–76.
Costa, A. L. (1985). Developing minds. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED262968.pdf
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51. https://ascd.org/el
Dinkelman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102238654
EUfolio. (2015). EU classroom ePortfolios: Pilot evaluation results. http://eufolio.eu/docs/PilotEvaluationResults.pdf.
Farrell, O. (2020). (e)Portfolio: A history. ASCILITE Publications, 289–294. https://publications.ascilite.org/index.php/APUB/article/view/440/413
Farrell, O., Buckley, K., Donaldson, L., & Farrelly, T. (2021). Eportfolio in Ireland: A landscape snapshot of current practice. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v6i1.99
Farrell, O., & Seery, A. (2019). I am not simply learning and regurgitating information, I am also learning about myself: Learning portfolio practice and online distance students. Distance Education, 40(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553565
Fletcher, T., Nί Chrόinίn, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2016). Multiple layers of interactivity in self-study of practice research: An empirically-based exploration of methodological issues. In D. Garbett, & A. Ovens, (Eds.), Enacting self-study as methodology for professional inquiry (pp. 19–25). Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices.
Foundation Coalition. (2002). Peer assessment and peer evaluation. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/37465138/peer-assessment-and-peer-evaluation-foundation-coalition
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Vaughan, N. D. (2024). Community of inquiry framework. Community of Inquiry. https://coi.athabascau.ca/coi-model/
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. Jossey-Bass.
Gee, J. (2014). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5th ed.). Routledge.
Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.54
Google. (2023). Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/
Guilfoyle, K., Hamilton, M. L., Pinnegar, S., & Placier, P. (2004). The epistemological dimensions and dynamics of professional dialogue in self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M.L. Hallam, G. C., Harper, W. E., McCowan, C. R., Hauville, K. L., McAllister, L. M., & Creagh, T. A. (2008). ePortfolio use by university students in Australia: Informing excellence in policy and practice. Queensland University of Technology ePrints. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/216079/
Haralabous, A., & Darra, M. (2018). Eportfolio, alternative assessment and student self-assessment: Exploration of the correlation in primary education. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8(2), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v8i2.13097
Harver, A., Zuber, P. D., & Bastian, H. (2019). The capstone ePortfolio in an undergraduate public health program: Accreditation, assessment, and audience. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00125
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hauge, K. (2021). Self-study research: Challenges and opportunities in teacher education. In M. J. Hernandez-Serrano (Ed.), Teacher education in the 21st century - Emerging skills for a changing world (pp. 139–156). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96252
Hedberg, J., & Corrent-Agostinho, S. (1999). Creating a postgraduate virtual community: Assessment drives learning. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1093–1098). Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education. http://www.editlib.org/p/7040
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230527668
International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
Johnsen, H. L. (2012). Making learning visible with eportfolios: Coupling the right pedagogy with the right technology. International Journal of ePortfolio, 2(2), 139–148. http://www.theijep.com/articleView.cfm?id=84
Kalmbach, J. (2017). Beyond the object to the making of the object: Understanding the process of multimodal composition as assemblage. In K. B. Yancey & S. J. McElroy (Eds.), Assembling composition (pp. 60–77). Conference on College Composition and Communication.
LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_21
Lambrev, V. S., & Cruz, B. C. (2021). Becoming scholarly practitioners: Creating community in online professional doctoral education. Distance Education, 42(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1986374
Lyons, N., & LaBoskey, V. K. (2002). Why narrative inquiry or exemplars for a scholarship of teaching? In N. Lyons & V. K. LaBoskey (Eds.), Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching (pp. 11–27). Teachers College Press.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 39–58). Scottish Academic Press.
Marule, T. O. (2012). Niitsitapi relational and experiential theories in education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 35(1), 131–143. https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/CJNE
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2009). Personalised learning spaces and self-regulated learning: Global examples of effective pedagogy. Same places, different spaces: Proceedings of Ascilite Auckland 2009, 639–645. https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/88953/personalised-learning-spaces-and-self-regulated-learning-global-examples-of-effective-pedagogy
Modise, M. P. (2021). Postgraduate students’ perception of the use of e-portfolios as a teaching tool to support learning in an open and distance education institution. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i2.508
Modise, M. P., & Mudau, P. K. (2023). Using ePortfolios for meaningful teaching and learning in distance education in developing countries: A systematic review. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 71(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2022.2067731
Molotsi, A. R., & Goosen, L. (2019). E-tutors’ perspectives on the collaborative learning approach as a means to support students of computing matters of course. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association (SACLA) (pp. 37–54). http://sacla2019.unisa.ac.za/Preprints/FP_Molotsi_e-Tutors'%20Perspectives.pdf
Mudau, P. K., & Modise, M. P. (2022). Using ePortfolios for active student engagement in the ODeL environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 425–438. https://doi.org/10.28945/5012
Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., & Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes and procedures: A theoretical overview. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 14–20. https://indianapublications.com/articles/IJHSS_3(1)_14-20_61f38990115064.95135470.pdf
Ng'ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., & Wood, D. (2016). Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education – A rear view of a 20-year journey. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12485
Penny Light, T. (2016). Empowering learners with eportfolios: Harnessing the “evidence of experience” for authentic records of achievement. The AAEEBL ePortfolio Review (AePR), 1(1), 5–11.
Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12938
Poole, P., Brown, M., McNamara, G., O'Hara, J., O'Brien, S., & Burns, D. (2018). Challenges and supports towards the integration of ePortfolios in education. Lessons to be learned from Ireland. Heliyon, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00899
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Rhodes, T., Chen, H. L., Watson, C. E., & Garrison, W. (2014). Editorial: A call for more rigorous ePortfolio research. International Journal of ePortfolio, 4(1), 1–5. https://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP144.pdf
Samaras, A. P., & Freese, A. R. (2009). Looking back and looking forward: A historical overview of the self-study school. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 3–19). Sense Publishers.
Shea, P., Vickers, J., & Hayes, S. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3),127–154. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.915
Slepcevic-Zach, P., & Stock, M. (2018). ePortfolio as a tool for reflection and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437399
Sobko, T., & Brown, G. (2019). Reflecting on personal data in a health course: Integrating wearable technology and ePortfolio for eHealth. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4027
Thanh, N. C., & Thanh, T. T. (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 24–27.
Thistlethwaite, J. (2006). More thoughts on “assessment drives learning.” Medical Education, 40(11), 1149–1150.
Torras, M. E., & Mayordomo, R. (2011). Teaching presence and regulation in an electronic portfolio. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2284–2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.007
Torres, J. J., & McKinley, M. (2023). From review to practice: Implementing ePortfolio Research in professional identity formation. International Journal of ePortfolio, 13(1), 1–9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1407254.pdf
University of South Africa. (2023). About the college. https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/corporate/default/About
Van Wyk, M. M. (2017). An e-portfolio as empowering tool to enhance students’ self-directed learning in a teacher education course: A case of a South African university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(3), 274–291. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-80865509f
Vanassche, E., & Keltcherman, G. (2015). The state of art in self-study of teacher education Practices: A systematic review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(4), 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.995712
Vaughan, N. D. (2013). Investigating how digital technologies can support a triad-approach to assessment in higher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2RG6X
Vaughan N. D. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247
Vaughan, N. D., Dell, D., Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2023). Principles of blended learning: Shared metacognition and communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press. https://www.aupress.ca/books/120324-principles-of-blended-learning/
Yancey, K. B., Robertson, L., & Taczak. K. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing. University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrr95
Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. (2015). The role of e‐portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276–1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12316
Yeh, S. S. (2009). The cost-effectiveness of raising teacher quality. Educational Research Review, 4(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.06.002
Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016). The impact of teaching presence on online engagement behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116648171
Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B.M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 318-329). https://www.drghazi.net/media/drghazi/documentary8.pdf#page=329
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Mphoentle Puleng Modise, Norm Vaughan 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Droits d’auteur
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.
