Naviguer dans l'horizon comodal : découvrir les réussites et les obstacles de l'enseignement comodal au premier cycle
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28853Mots-clés :
enseignement supérieur, hybride, comodal, apprentissage en ligne, technologieRésumé
Depuis la pandémie de la COVID-19, la demande de formules d’apprentissage flexibles et en ligne a augmenté dans l’enseignement postsecondaire. L’approche comodale, où les étudiantes et étudiants peuvent assister aux cours en ligne ou en personne, est devenue une option populaire. Cependant, les recherches sur la mise en œuvre de cours comodaux non magistraux dans des environnements d’apprentissage de premier cycle restent limitées. Cette étude a examiné les avantages et les défis du comodal dans des contextes autres que les cours magistraux à travers le cadre de la communauté d’enquête. En utilisant une méthodologie de recherche-action participative, les données ont été recueillies à partir de notes de terrain de l’enseignant-chercheur, de comptes rendus vidéo et d’entretiens avec les étudiantes et étudiants. Une analyse thématique a révélé que la flexibilité est le principal avantage de la formule comodale. Des défis considérables ont émergé, notamment la neutralité des modalités et la gestion des problèmes techniques liés à la qualité audio et vidéo. Les implications pratiques incluent le soutien institutionnel sous forme d’infrastructures techniques améliorées et de formation pour les enseignantes et enseignants. Les limites de l’étude comprennent la petite taille de l’échantillon, l’homogénéité démographique, les données autodéclarées et une attention limitée portée aux résultats d’apprentissage. Des approches de recherche futures sont proposées pour relever les défis liés à la conception des formules comodales.
Références
Abdelmalak, M. M. M., & Parra, J. L. (2016). Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 6(4), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2016100102
Badiozaman, I. F. A., Ling, V. M., & Ng, A. (2024). University students’ experiences and reflection on their transition to HyFlex learning during post-COVID times. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(4), 448–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231226407
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Barbour, M. K., LaBonte, R., Kelly, K., Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. (2020). Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online teaching. Canadian e-Learning Network. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347535715_Understanding_Pandemic_Pedagogy_Differences_Between_Emergency_Remote_Remote_and_Online_Teaching
Beatty, B. J. (Ed.). (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes (1st ed.). EdTech Books. https://doi.org/10.59668/33
Binnewies, S., & Wang, Z. (2019). Challenges of student equity and engagement in a HyFlex Course. In C. Allan, C. Campbell, & J. Crough (Eds.), Blended learning designs in STEM higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_12
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Jensen, J. L., & Harsell, D. M. (2016). The impact of emotions on student achievement in synchronous hybrid business and public administration programs: A longitudinal test of control-value theory. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(4), 441–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12110
Chan, H. C. B., Dou, Y., Jiang, Y., & Li, P. (2022). A 4C model for HyFlex classrooms. In H. V. Leong, S. S. Sarvestani, Y. Teranishi, A. Cuzzocrea, H. Kashiwazaki, D. Towey, J.-J. Yang, & H. Shahriar (Eds.), 2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) (pp. 145–150). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00029
Chen, G., & Lai, N. (2024). Enhancing interdisciplinary English learning: A systematic review of the HyFlex model’s strategies, challenges, and implications. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61388
Chen, R. H. (2022). Effects of deliberate practice on blended learning sustainability: A community of inquiry perspective. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031785
Cheng, K. Y. (2023). HyFlex challenges and strategies for matured learners: Construction engineering higher education in New Zealand during the pandemic. Journal of Educators Online, 20(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1393764.pdf
Coffey, L. (2023, August 15). “Dynamic, uncertain moment” for online learning. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/teaching-learning/2023/08/15/report-suggests-online-learning-has-yet-peak
Cumming, T. M., Gilanyi, L., & Han, C. (2024a). HyFlex delivery mode in a postgraduate course: Instructor and student perspectives. Discover Education, 3, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00110-0
Cumming, T. M., Han, C., & Gilanyi, L. (2024b). University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 7, Article 100229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100229
Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett, E. J., & Dyer, K. (2022). Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: Climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Garrison, D. R. (2024). A brief history of the Community of Inquiry framework (a personal recollection). In The Design of Digital Learning Environments (pp. 26-43). Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gedera, D. (2023). Experiences of learning and teaching in HyFlex spaces. In T. Cochrane, V. Narayan, C. Brown, K. MacCallum, E. Bone, C. Deneen, R. Vanderburg, & B. Hurren (Eds.), People, partnerships and pedagogies. Proceedings ASCILITE 2023 (pp. 404–409). ASCILITE. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.608
Gillis, A., & Krull, L. M. (2020). COVID-19 remote learning transition in Spring 2020: Class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teaching Sociology, 48(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20954263
Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2021). Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), Article 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454
Homer-Dixon, T., & Rockström, J. (2022, November 13). What happens when a cascade of crises collide? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/13/opinion/coronavirus-ukraine-climate-inflation.html
Howell, E. (2022). HyFlex model of higher education: Understanding the promise of flexibility. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 30(4), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-04-2022-0019
Howell, E., Hubbard, K. L., Linder, S. M., Madison, S., Ryan, J. B., & Bridges, W. C. (2023). HyFlex pedagogy: Six strategies supported by design-based research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1042–1054. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-02-2023-0050
Huang, Y., Shu, F., Zhao, C., & Huang, J. (2017). Investigating and analyzing teaching effect of blended synchronous classroom. In J. Liu, S. Nishimura, H. Zhang, & Q. Jin (Eds.), Proceedings 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) (pp. 134–135). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.40
Karaoglan-Yılmaz, F. G., Üstün, A. B., Zhang, K., & Yılmaz, R. (2023). Metacognitive awareness, reflective thinking, problem-solving, and community of inquiry as predictors of academic self-efficacy in blended learning: A correlational study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.989874
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Sage Publications. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-023
Kim, R., Olfman, L., Ryan, T., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments. Computers & Education, 70, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2021). Adopting HyFlex in higher education in response to COVID-19: Students’ perspectives. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1906641
Kolli, S., Morton, E., Afridi, A., Zhang, K., & Kim, E. (2022). Assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on K–12 public school educators and administrators on their practices and autonomy in East Gainesville. University of Florida Journal of Undergraduate Research, 24, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.24.130776
Leijon, M., & Lundgren, B. (2019). Connecting physical and virtual spaces in a HyFlex pedagogic model with a focus on teacher interaction. Journal of Learning Spaces, 8(1), 1–9. https://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1640
Li, X., Yang, Y., Chu, S. K. W., Zainuddin, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Applying blended synchronous teaching and learning for flexible learning in higher education: An action research study at a university in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1766417
Lightner, C. A., & Lightner-Laws, C. A. (2024). A new day in higher ed: HyFlex universities. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 7364-7381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2312932
Magana, A. J., Karabiyik, T., Thomas, P., Jaiswal, A., Perera, V., & Dworkin, J. (2022). Teamwork facilitation and conflict resolution training in a HyFlex course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(2), 446–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20450
Mahande, R. D., Abdal, N. M., & Nasir, N. (2024). Investigating the effect of learning styles on HyFlex learning towards equity of learning in higher education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 442–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-10-2023-0203
McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385679
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
O’Ceallaigh, T. J., Connolly, C., & O Brien, E. (2023). Hybrid pedagogies: Nurturing teaching presence in multi-modal learning spaces post pandemic [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Routledge Open Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.12688/routledgeopenres.17674.2
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/06/the-future-of-education-and-skills_5424dd26/54ac7020-en.pdf
Ørngreen, R., Levinsen, K., Jelsbak, V., Møller, K. L., & Bendsen, T. (2015). Simultaneous class-based and live video-streamed teaching: Experiences and derived principles from the bachelor programme in biomedical laboratory analysis. In A. Jefferies & M. Cubric (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th European conference on e-learning (ECEL 2015) (pp. 451–459). Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
Penrod, J. (2022, March 25). Staying relevant: The importance of incorporating HyFlex learning into higher education strategy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/3/staying-relevant-the-importance-of-incorporating-HyFlex-learning-into-higher-education-strategy
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Ramsey, D., Evans, J., & Levy, M. (2016). Preserving the seminar experience. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1077713
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934
Reed, P., Smith, B., & Sherratt, C. (2008). A new age of constructivism: “Mode neutral”. E-Learning and Digital Media, 5(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2008.5.3.310
Romero-Hall, E., & Ripine, C. (2021). Hybrid flexible instruction: Exploring faculty preparedness. Online Learning, 25(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2426
Romero-Hall, E., & Vicentini, C. R. (2017) Examining distance learners in Hybrid synchronous instruction: Successes and challenges. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1258
Shek, D. T. L., Zhu, X., Li, X., & Dou, D. (2022). Satisfaction with HyFlex teaching and law-abiding leadership education in Hong Kong university students under COVID-19. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(5), 2833–2858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10040-4
Wang, Q., Huang, C., & Quek, C. L. (2018). Students’ perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended synchronous learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3404
Wong, B. T., Li, K. C., Chan, H. T., & Cheung, S. K. (2023). HyFlex learning research and practice: A longitudinal analysis. Sustainability, 15(12), Article 9699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129699
Zitter, L. (2021, October 25). Synchronous vs. asynchronous class meaning: What’s the difference? EdTech. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2021/10/changing-face-instruction-synchronous-vs-asynchronous-e-learning-perfcon
Zydney, J. M., McKimmy, P., Lindberg, R., & Schmidt, M. (2018). Here or there instruction: Lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. TechTrends, 63(2). 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Laura Morrison, Robin Kay, Alison Mann, Diane Tepylo, Hannah Atkinson, Iain Brodie 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Droits d’auteur
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.
