Differences in Students’ Perceptions of the Community of Inquiry in a Blended Synchronous Delivery Mode
As more post-secondary institutions are turning to non-face-to-face course delivery modes to cater to the emerging needs of the student population, we have yet to find out whether students attending both at a distance and face-to-face have access to equal learning opportunities. A research was conducted in the nursing program taught in the blended synchronous delivery mode at the Cégep de la Gaspésie et des Îles over the winter 2017 semester. Using the Community of Inquiry framework and questionnaire elaborated by Garrison et al. (2000) and later revised by Shea and Bidjerano (2010), face-to-face (n=20) and at-a-distance (n=25) students’ perceptions of the four Community of Inquiry presences (teaching, social, cognitive and learner) were measured and compared. Results of the overall presences comparison reveal that face-to-face participants perceived a stronger teaching presence than students attending from a satellite site, while the distinctive elements of each presence reveal significant difference between students’ perceptions of the teaching, cognitive and learner presences. Additionally, students’ comments provide rich qualitative data that explain the quantitative results obtained.
Abdelmalak, M. (2014). Towards flexible learning for adult students: HyFlex design. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 706-712). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130839
Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal, 32(1), 33.
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
Bergeron, M.-H. (2014). Innovating to promote access to higher education in rural areas. Pédagogie Collégiale, (27)4, Summer 2014. Retrieved from http://aqpc.qc.ca/sites/default/files/revue/Bergeron-Vol_27-4.pdf
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Bradford, G. R. (2011). A relationship study of student satisfaction with learning online and cognitive load: Initial results. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 217-226. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.001
Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18–35. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/sites/default/files/v5n2_brown_1.pdf
Cégep de la Gaspésie et des Îles. (n.d.). Le Cégep. Retrieved from http://www.cegepgim.ca/cegep
Choy, J. L. F., & Quek, C. L. (2016). Modelling relationships between students’ academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4). doi: 10.14742/ajet.2500
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269-292. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234
Conklina, S., Oyarzun, B., & Barreto, D. (2017). Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives. Research on Education and Media, 9(1). doi:10.1515/rem-2017-0004
Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6).
Demers, G. (2014). Chantier sur l’offre de formation collégiale: Rapport final du Chantier sur l’offre de formation collégiale. Retrieved from https://fneeq.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/DEMERS-Report-juin-2014.pdf
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/coi_site/documents/Garrison_Anderson_Archer_Critical_Inquiry_model.pdf
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Grenier, A., & Centre d’étude sur l’emploi et la technologie (Québec). (2011). Le marché du travail au Québec: perspectives à long terme, 2010-2019. Retrieved from http://www.emploiquebec.gouv.qc.ca/publications/pdf/00_imt_marche-travail_long-terme_2012-2021.pdf
Lakhal, S. & Meyer, F. (2019). Blended Learning.Tatnall A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. (1-9). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-60013-0_41-1
Lakhal, S., Bateman, D., & Bédard, J. (2017). Blended synchronous delivery modes in graduate programs: A literature review and how it is implemented in the master teacher program. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 47. doi:10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747
McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7-22. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982678.pdf
Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-251. Retrieved from https://docdrop.org/static/drop-pdf/ConstructivismDay1-ln36v.pdf
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316-326. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
Swan, K. (2004). Relationships between interactions and learning in online environment. Retrieved from: https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/SLOANCUS/S041202C.pdf.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students’ and instructor’s experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4250–4254. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.926
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. (2014). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 1-17. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.881391
Tichavsky, L. P., Hunt, A. N., Driscoll, A., & Jicha, K. (2015). “It’s just nice having a real teacher”: Student perceptions of online versus face-to-face instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 2. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090202
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (original work published in 1934).
Wang, Q., Quek, C. L., & Hu, X. (2017). Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: An educational design research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034
Wicks, D. A., Craft, B. B., Mason, G. N., Gritter, K., & Bolding, K. (2015). An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a Faculty Learning Community. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 53-62. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.001
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne-Marie Lafortune, Sawsen Lakhal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.