Privacy and Emotional Intelligence in Technology-Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28814Keywords:
emotional intelligence, Kazakhstan, mobile technologies, privacy orientation, technology adoptionAbstract
This study explores the influence of emotional intelligence and privacy orientation on attitudes and intentions to learn with mobile technologies. Data were collected from 272 respondents in Kazakhstan, a country with a transitioning economy. The findings reveal that both emotional intelligence and privacy orientation positively affect attitudes and intentions, except for the dimension of concern about one’s own informational privacy. Additionally, a model incorporating both emotional intelligence and privacy orientation explains variations in attitudes and intentions more effectively than models with either factor alone. This research contributes to the understanding of the multidimensional constructs of mobile learning, privacy, and emotional intelligence in non-Western contexts, providing valuable insights for technology adoption in transitional economies.
References
Abu-Shanab, E., & Abu-Shanab, A. (2022). The influence of emotional intelligence on technology adoption and decision-making process. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 15(5), 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2022.10041125
Adhikary, A., Diatha, K. S., Borah, S. B., & Sharma, A. (2021). How does the adoption of digital payment technologies influence unorganized retailers’ performance? An investigation in an emerging market. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 882–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00778-y
Akpan, I. J., Udoh, E. A. P., & Adebisi, B. (2020). Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1820185
Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2024). Emotional intelligence in digital interactions: A call for renewed assessments. Personality and Individual Differences, 223, 112613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112613
Bali, S., Chen, T. C., & Liu, M. C. (2024). Behavioral intentions of low-achieving students to use mobile English learning: Integrating self-determination theory, theory of planned behavior, and technology acceptance model approaches. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2364142
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
Baruh, L., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2014). It is more than personal: Development and validation of a multidimensional privacy orientation scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.042
Bayaga, A., & du Plessis, A. (2024). Ramifications of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) among developing countries’ higher education staffs. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 9689–9714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12194-6
Briz, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. (2016). Learning with mobile technologies – Students’ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
D'Amico, A., & Geraci, A. (2023). Beyond emotional intelligence: The new construct of meta-emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1096663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096663
Davis, M., Lennerfors, T. T., & Tolstoy, D. (2022). Can blockchain-technology fight corruption in MNEs’ operations in emerging markets? Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-12-2020-0155
Davis Le Brun, S., Butchard, S., Kinderman, P., Umeh, K., & Whittington, R. (2023). Applying the theory of planned behaviour to understand mental health professionals’ intentions to work using a human rights-based approach in acute inpatient settings. Journal of Mental Health, 33(3), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2245910
Dogruel, L., Joeckel, S., & Henke, J. (2023). Disclosing personal information in mHealth apps: Testing the role of privacy attitudes, app habits, and social norm cues. Social Science Computer Review, 41(5), 1791–1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221108820
Fiori, M., Agnoli, S., & Davis, S. K. (2023). New trends in emotional intelligence: Conceptualization, understanding, and assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1266076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266076
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Hagger, M. S., Cheung, M. W.-L., Ajzen, I., & Hamilton, K. (2022). Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 41(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001153
Hameed, F., Qayyum, A., & Khan, F. A. (2024). A new trend of learning and teaching: Behavioral intention towards mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Education, 11, 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00252-w
Hou, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). The unified theory of acceptance and use of DingTalk for educational purposes in China: An extended structural equation model. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10, 733. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02257-x
Hsu, S.-H., Tang, K.-P., Lin, C.-H., Chen, P., & Wang, L.-H. (2023). Applying the theory of planned behavior to investigate type 2 diabetes patients' intention to receive injection therapy. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1066633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1066633
Huang, R. T. (2022). Explore the moderating impact of learners’ anticipated emotions on mobile learning outcome: A moderated mediation model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(6), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2076717
Jeon, H., & Lee, C. (2022). Internet of Things Technology: Balancing privacy concerns with convenience. Telematics and Informatics, 70, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101816
Kowal, M. (2024). Translation practices in cross-cultural social research and guidelines for the most popular approach: Back-translation. Anthropological Review, 87(3), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.87.3.02
Krouska, A., Troussas, C., Kabassi, K., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). An empirical investigation of user acceptance of personalized mobile software for sustainability education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2241614
Li, F., Zhu, D., Lin, M.-T., & Kim, P. B. (2024). The technology acceptance model and hospitality and tourism consumers’ intention to use mobile technologies: Meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655241226558
Li, Y., Zhang, X., Guo, X., & Wang, L. (2019). Underlying emotional mechanisms of routine m-health use in chronically ill patients. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2940242
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Japutra, A., Molinillo, S., Singh, N., & Sinha, N. (2020). Assessment of mobile technology use in the emerging market: Analyzing intention to use m-payment services in India. Telecommunications Policy, 44(9), 102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102009
Lin, S.-H., Lee, H.-C., Chang, C.-T., & Fu, C. J. (2020). Behavioral intention towards mobile learning in Taiwan, China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Technology in Society, 63, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2020.101387
Lin, X., Wang, Q., Limniou, M., Huijser, H., Yu, J. J., & Gu, H. (2024). The mediating role of technology acceptance and moderating role of emotion regulation in faculty’s online professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9060
Ling, E. C., Tussyadiah, I., Tuomi, A., Stienmetz, J., & Ioannou, A. (2021). Factors influencing users' adoption and use of conversational agents: A systematic review. Psychology & Marketing, 38(7), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21491
Liu, G., & Wang, Y. (2024). Modeling EFL teachers’ intention to integrate informal digital learning of English (IDLE) into the classroom using the theory of planned behavior. System, 120, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103193
Lopes, R., Navarro, J., Caetano, A., & Silva, A. J. (2017). Forecasting the influence of customer-related micro-events on employees’ emotional, attitudinal and physiological responses. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(6), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1360286
Pekaar, K., Linden, D., & Born, M. (2018). Self- and other-focused emotional intelligence: Development and validation of the Rotterdam Emotional Intelligence Scale (REIS). Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.045
Ried, L., Eckerd, S., & Kaufmann, L. (2022). Social desirability bias in PSM surveys and behavioral experiments: Considerations for design development and data collection. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(1), 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100743
Roberts, R., Flin, R., Millar, D., & Corradi, L. (2021). Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry. Technovation, 102, 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102219
Sivakumar, C. L. V., Mone, V., & Abdumukhtor, R. (2024). Addressing privacy concerns with wearable health monitoring technology. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 14(3), e1535. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1535
Svenningsson, J., Höst, G., Hultén, M., & Hallström, J. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward technology: exploring the relationship among affective, cognitive and behavioral components of the attitude construct. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09657-7
Tarhini, A., AlHinaį, M., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Govindaluri, S. M., & Al Shaqsi, J. D. (2024). What drives the adoption of mobile learning services among college students: An application of SEM-neural network modeling. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1), 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100235
Yang, M., Al Mamun, A., Gao, J., Rahman, M. K., Salameh, A. A., & Alam, S. S. (2024). Predicting m-health acceptance from the perspective of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Scientific Reports, 14, 339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50436-2
Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Leaking my face via payment: Unveiling the influence of technology anxiety, vulnerabilities, and privacy concerns on user resistance to facial recognition payment. Telecommunications Policy, 48(3), 102703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102703
Zhu, Z., & Huang, W. (2023). A meta-analysis of mobile learning adoption using extended UTAUT. Information Development, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231176428
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuliya Frolova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.