Durabilité et évolutivité des outils numériques d'apprentissage : ABRACADABRA au Kenya

Auteurs-es

  • Larysa Lysenko Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-3381
  • Philip C. Abrami Center for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University
  • C. Anne Wade Center for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27961

Mots-clés :

technologie éducative, facteurs de durabilité, évolutivité, Afrique sub-saharienne

Résumé

Cet article explore les facteurs permettant d'augmenter la probabilité que la mise en œuvre d'ABRACADABRA, une approche technologique de l'enseignement et de l'apprentissage de l'alphabétisation, perdure et s'étende au-delà de la recherche initiale. Commencée comme une étude pilote dans 12 classes, la mise en œuvre s'est étendue à plus de 500 classes primaires sur six ans dans cinq régions du Kenya. S'inspirant de la recherche sur l'évolutivité et la durabilité des interventions éducatives et de la théorie valeur-expectative-coût, une enquête exploratoire a été conçue pour interroger une série d'acteurs impliqués dans la mise en œuvre du logiciel. Nous avons utilisé une combinaison d'approches de codage a priori et axées sur les données pour analyser les récits. Nous avons ensuite construit un modèle explorant la relation entre les expectatives-valeur-coût et les facteurs associés à la mise en œuvre et à la durabilité. Le modèle explique une part importante de la variance dans l'intention autodéclarée d'utiliser le logiciel, les contributions les plus significatives provenant des politiques, du développement professionnel et des étudiants. Ces résultats peuvent être utiles dans le contexte des pays à revenu faible ou moyen où il n'existe pas de principes validés par la recherche pour construire des interventions éducatives durables et évolutives.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Larysa Lysenko, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University

Larysa Lysenko, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University. Dr. Lysenko has been working on the CSLP research projects about implementation, sustainability and scale-up of educational technologies for teaching and learning.  She is interested in learning about how teachers advance their practice and how educational innovation impacts their instruction and students’ learning outcomes.

Philip C. Abrami, Center for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University

Philip C. Abrami, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University. Dr. Abrami, the former CSLP Director, has been the leader in developing educational software and has served as the principal investigator on a multitude of large-scale projects. He has published widely on topics ranging from instructional effectiveness to distance learning and educational technology.

C. Anne Wade, Center for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University

C. Anne Wade, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University. Anne Wade, (M.L.I.S.) currently serves as the LTK+ Global Manager. Building on her experience with project management, knowledge exchange and partnerships for the CSLP, she co-designs training and curriculum materials and oversees the administrative components of the projects.

Références

Abrami, P. C., Lysenko, L., & Borokhovski, E. (2020). The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: An updated meta-analysis and landscape review of applied field research. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 36, 260-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12417

Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000160146

Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., Lysenko, L., Marsh, J., & Gioko, A. (2016). Using educational technology to develop early literacy skills in Sub-Saharan Africa. Education and Information Technologies. 19(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9362-4

Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000160146

Bennell, P., & Akyeampong, K. (2007). Teacher motivation in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia (No. 71). Department for International Development. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08be640f0b652dd000f9a/ResearchingtheIssuesNo71.pdf

Bold, T., Kimenyi, M., Mwabu, G., & Sandefur, J. (2018). Experimental evidence on scaling up education reforms in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 168, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.007

Century, J., Cassata, A., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2012). Measuring enactment of innovations and the factors that affect implementation and sustainability: Moving toward common language and shared conceptual understanding. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 39, 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-012-9287-x

Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard University Press.

Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003

Dede, C. (2006). Scaling up: Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 551-566). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.034

Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33

Evans, D. K., & Popova, A. (2016). What really works to improve learning in developing countries? An analysis of divergent findings in systematic reviews. The World Bank Research Observer, 31(2), 242-270. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkw004

Fullan, M. (1982, February). Implementing educational change: Progress at last. [Paper presentation] (ED221540) Conference on the Implications of Research on Teaching for Practice, Washington, D.C., United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED221540.pdf

Goodson, I. (1989). Curriculum reform and curriculum theory: A case of historical amnesia. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764890190203

Kim, Y. S. G., Lee, H., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2020). Impact of literacy interventions on reading skills in low‐and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), 638-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13204

Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., Marsh, J., WaGioko, M., & Kiforo, E. (2019). Promoting young Kenyans’ growth in literacy with educational technology: A tale of two years of implementation. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.013

McLean, R., & Gargani, J. (2019). Scaling impact: Innovation for the public good. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468025

Mingaine, L. (2013). Challenges in the implementation of ICT in public secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Education and Learning, 2, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n1p32

Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Forkosh, B. A., & Tubin, D. (2004). Sustainability, scalability and transferability of ICT-based pedagogical innovations in Israeli schools. Education, Communication & Information, 4(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631042000210999

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Myers, R. (1984, October 29-31). Going to scale. United Nations Children’s Fund Inter-agency Meeting on Community-based Child development. [Paper Presentation] (ED273352). New York, NY, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED273352.pdf

Omwenga, E., Nyabero, C., & Okioma, L. (2015). Assessing the influence of the PTTC principal’s competency in ICT on the teachers’ integration of ICT in teaching science in PTTCs in Nyanza region, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35), 142-148.

Piper, B., Destefano, J., Kinyanjui, E. M., & Ong’ ele, S. (2018). Scaling up successfully: Lessons from Kenya’s Tusome national literacy program. Journal of Educational Change, 19(3), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9325-4

Pouezevara, S., Mekhael, S. W., & Darcy, N. (2014). Planning and evaluating ICT in education programs using the four dimensions of sustainability: A program evaluation from Egypt. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(2), 120-141.

Robinson, J. P., Winthrop, R., & McGivney, E. J. (2016). Millions learning: Scaling up quality education in developing countries. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/research/millions-learning-scaling-up-quality-education-in-developing-countries/

Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.

Salinas, Á., Nussbaum, M., Herrera, O., Solarte, M., & Aldunate, R. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of information and communication technologies in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2175-2196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9540-7

Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.67

Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.

UNESCO. (2015). Education for sustainable development: Learning objectives. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf

UNESCO. (2021a). Reimagining our futures together – A new social contract for education. Report from the International Commission on the futures of education, 2021. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en

UNESCO. (2021b). One year into COVID: Prioritizing education recovery to avoid a generational catastrophe. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376984

UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2019a). Meeting commitments: Are countries on track to achieve SDG 4? Global education monitoring report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000369009

UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2019b). Fact Sheet No. 56. New methodology shows that 258 million children, adolescents and youth are out of school. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-methodology-shows-258-million-children-adolescents-and-youth-are-out-school.pdf

United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Development Goals. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

Publié-e

2022-08-10

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles