Possibilités de conception pédagogique behavioriste-constructiviste dans le cadre de la communauté d'enquête
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28673Mots-clés :
apprentissage hybride, béhaviorisme, communauté d’enquête, enseignement supérieur, constructivisme, socioconstructivismeRésumé
Le discours sur l’apprentissage hybride ne doit pas détourner l’attention de l’apprentissage en se concentrant explicitement sur les technologies. Lorsque des discussions centrées sur la personne apprenante sont intégrées, elles peuvent se limiter à des pédagogies constructivistes, comme le montre le cadre bien établi de la communauté d’enquête (CE). Alors que quelques avancées précoces plaident en faveur des pédagogies behavioristes pour étayer le cadre de la CE en particulier, et qu’une pléthore de littérature soutient l’interaction behavioriste-constructiviste pour l’apprentissage hybride en général, cette étude est la première à proposer ces interactions dans le cadre de la CE pour l’apprentissage hybride. Elle remet également en question la conception pédagogique socioconstructiviste indépendante qui prévaut dans le cadre de la CE pour traiter les complexités de l’enseignement supérieur en adoptant une position décoloniale. Dans cette optique, nous expliquons l’impact de passer à côté des conceptions behavioristes dans le cadre de la CE à travers le problème de l’insoutenabilité épistémologique et celui de l’apprentissage présumé. Après avoir justifié l’inclusion des conceptions behavioristes, nous mettons l’accent sur les interactions behavioristes-constructivistes au sein du cadre. Cet essai contribue à la recherche dynamique en cours sur la CE et encourage la communauté de recherche à explorer empiriquement le positionnement d’une telle conception pédagogique dans ce cadre.
Références
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893
Ahmad, S., Sultana, N., & Jamil, S. (2020). Behaviorism vs constructivism: A paradigm shift from traditional to alternative assessment techniques. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 19–33.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3–22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ837483.pdf
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Anderson, T. (2017). How communities of inquiry drive teaching and learning in the digital age. Contact North, 1, 1–6. https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/how-communities-inquiry-drive-teaching-and-learning-digital-age
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Annand, D. (2019). Limitations of the community of inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(2), 1–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1242715.pdf
Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73–85. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ842689.pdf
Artopoulos, A. (2023). Labyrinths of platformization of education in the Global South (and beyond). In C. Cobo & A. Rivas (Eds.), The new digital education policy landscape (pp. 147–164). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003373018
Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (2013). Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 17–34). Routledge.
Blanchette, J., & Kanuka, H. (1999). Applying constructivist learning principles in the virtual classroom. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 1999-World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 434-439).
Brandstedt, L. (2023). Time to give up learner centred pedagogy. Proceedings of the 16th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Spain (pp. 1569–1578). https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2023.0484
Brown, M. (2021). What are the main trends in online learning? A helicopter view of possible futures. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2). http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/605
Brown, S., Saxena, D., & Wall, P. J. (2023). Data collection in the global south: Practical, methodological, and philosophical considerations. Information Technology for Development, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2023.2185581
Campbell, A., Craig, T., & Collier-Reed, B. (2020). A framework for using learning theories to inform ‘growth mindset’ activities. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1562118
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Chou, C. C. (2020). Reviving the theoretical relevancy of blended learning: An integrated approach to vocational competency.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007013
Cook, D. A. (1993). Behaviorism evolves. Educational Technology, 33(10), 62–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428114
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Cronjé, J. (2000). Paradigms lost: Towards integrating objectivism and constructivism. ITForum Paper, 48.
Cronjé, J. (2006). Paradigms regained: Toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning sciences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9605-1
Cronje, J. (2020). Towards a new definition of blended learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.001
Cronjé, J. C. (2022). Blending behaviourism and constructivism: A case study in support of a new definition of blended learning. Progressio, 41(1). https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-progress-v41-n1-a14
Cullen, J., Hadjivassilio, K., Hamilton, E., Kelleher, J., Sommerld, E., & Stern, E. (2002). Review of current pedagogic research and practice in the fields of post-compulsory education and lifelong learning. The Tavistock Institute.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1–4. https://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewMaterial.htm?id=263985
Elander, K., & Cronje, J. C. (2016). Paradigms revisited: A quantitative investigation into a model to integrate objectivism and constructivism in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9424-y
Elen, J. (2017). Implications: Cherishing the middle ground. In L. Lin & J. M. Spector (Eds.), The sciences of learning and instructional design (pp. 79–87). Routledge.
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, 2(1), 8–33. https://gchallenge.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Constructivism.pdf
Garrison, D. R. (2012). Article review – Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 250–253. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1184/2099
Garrison, D. R. (2015). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a community of inquiry (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740751
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
Gregory, M. (1999). A behavioral pedagogy for the community of inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 19(1). https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at/article/view/690
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296434
Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out the chaos in the literature. International Journal of Radical Pedagogy, 1(2). http://hdl.handle.net/2149/728
Kerssens, N., & van Dijck, J. (2023). The platformization of primary education in the Netherlands. In C. Cobo & A. Rivas (Eds.), The new digital education policy landscape (pp. 9–28). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003373018
Khan, A. S., & Nawaz, A. (2010). Digital literacy: The criteria for being educated in information society. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 10(10), 175–191. https://computerresearch.org/index.php/computer/article/view/1032
Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Epistemology or pedagogy, that is the question. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure (pp. 144–157). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878842
Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0462
Lammassaari, H., Hietajärvi, L., Lonka, K., Chen, S., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). Teachers’ epistemic beliefs and reported practices in two cultural contexts. Educational Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.2000369
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840272
Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961322
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 325–359. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1340511
Masiero, S. (2022). Should we still be doing ICT4D research? The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 88(5), e12215. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12215
Milad, M. (2019). The pedagogical development of blended learning. In S. Hidri (Ed.), English language teaching research in the Middle East and North Africa: Multiple perspectives (pp. 609–635). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6
Ojeaga, I. J., & Agbi, A. (2015). Constructivism: An alternative framework for academic excellence in office technology and management programme in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 22(1), 19–26. https://www.globalacademicgroup.com/journals/nact/Ibhade%20Joy%20Ojeaga.pdf
Rieber, L. P. (1992). Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296709
Sareen, S., & Mandal, S. (2024). Challenges of blended learning in higher education across global north-south: A systematic and integrative literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101011
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: A review of UK literature and practice. The Higher Education Academy, 4(2), 24–250. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5ae9c9bc52122aa77cb36e7add118741c0721672
Shield, G. (2000). A critical appraisal of learning technology using information and communication technologies. Journal of Technology Studies, 26(1), 71–79. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ609295
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Spector, J. M. (2004). Instructional technology and the learning sciences: Multiple communities and political realities. Educational Technology, 44(3), 47–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428909
Stoddard, J. D. (2010). The roles of epistemology and ideology in teachers’ pedagogy with historical ‘media’. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903475694
Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In Payne, C. R. (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–47). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004
Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50–60. https://scholars.ln.edu.hk/en/publications/constructivism-instructional-design-and-technology-implications-f
Terhart, E. (2003). Constructivism and teaching: a new paradigm in general didactics? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210163653
The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 16–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44401692
UC Berkeley. (2021). Learning: Theory and research. Graduate Student Instructor: Teaching & Resource Center. https://gsi.berkeley.edu/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/
United Nations. (2022). Global south countries (Group of 77 and China). Finance Center for South-South Cooperation. http://www.fc-ssc.org/en/partnership_program/south_south_countries
Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. https://purnima-valiathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Blended-Learning-Models-2002-ASTD.pdf
Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press.
Vaughan, N. D., Dell, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2023). Principles of blended learning: Shared metacognition and communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press.
Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 339–362. https://www.vrasidas.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/continuum.pdf
Weegar, M. A., & Pacis, D. (2012). A comparison of two theories of learning--behaviorism and constructivism as applied to face-to-face and online learning. In Proceedings e-leader conference, Manila. https://www.g-casa.com/conferences/manila/papers/Weegar.pdf
White-Clark, R., DiCarlo, M., & Gilchriest, S. N. (2008). "Guide on the side": An instructional approach to meet mathematics standards. The High School Journal, 91(4), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.0.0000
Whitelock, D., & Jelfs, A. (2003). Editorial: Journal of Educational Media special issue on blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 99–100.
Willis, J. (1995). A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology, 35(6), 5–23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ515158
Wolsey, T. D., & Fisher, D. (2009). Learning to predict and predicting to learn: Cognitive strategies and instructional routines. Allyn & Bacon.
Yu, Z., & Li, M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of community of inquiry in online learning contexts over twenty-five years. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11669–11688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11081-w
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Sheriya Sareen, Sayantan Mandal 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Droits d’auteur
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.
