Time Scarcity and Student Performance: Instructional Strategies for Busy Adult Online Students

Melanie Holmes

doi:10.21432/cjlt28357

Authors

Melanie Holmes American Public University System

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28357

Keywords:

online education, time scarcity, mental bandwidth, adult education

Abstract

Adult online college students often suffer from time scarcity, which results in a drain on cognitive capacity and executive function, thus lowering their ability to plan, reason, and multitask. Busy students often engage in tunneling, ignoring everything but the most pressing concern. To support these students, educators should recommend timelines for task completion and divide larger assignments into smaller tasks. To reduce feelings of time scarcity, classrooms should have a predictable rhythm of regular assignments, a clear syllabus, meaningful assignments, and no busywork. Allocating points for preparatory tasks affirms their value and demonstrates respect for students’ time. Educators can help students build slack into their schedules so that they can better navigate disruptions by recommending multitasking strategies, suggesting rules of thumb, highlighting key points in instructions, and distinguishing essential from non-essential resources. Better understanding the challenges of the busy adult online student can help educators more effectively support their success.

Author Biography

Melanie Holmes, American Public University System

Melanie Holmes is an Associate Professor at American Public University System. She holds a doctorate from McMaster University and has worked in online education for more than 20 years in both teaching and instructional design.

References

Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00441

Bradbury, N. A. (2016). Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 509-513. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016

Cook, B. R., & Babon, A. (2016). Active learning through online quizzes: Better learning and less (busy) work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1185772

Covelli, B. J. (2017). Online discussion boards: The practice of building community for adult learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1274616

De Sousa, M., Peterman, A., & Reeve, C. (2018) An initial model of scarcity. Qualitative Psychology, 5(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000077

Dubey, S. (2019). Towards finding association between decision fatigue and critical thinking in the constructive e-learning environment. International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 7(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16936.83208

Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x

Fyfe, E., De Leeuw, J., Carvalho, P., Goldstone, R., Sherman, J., Admiraal, D., Alford, L., Bonner, A., Brassil, C., Brooks, C., Carbonetto, T., Chang, S., Cruz, L., Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M., Daniel, F., Driessen, M., Habashy, N., Hanson-Bradley, C., Hirt, E., & Carbonell, V. (2021). Many Classes 1: Assessing the generalizable effect of immediate feedback versus delayed feedback across many college classes. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211027575

Gneezy, A., Imas, A., & Jaroszewicz, A. (2020). The impact of agency on time and risk preferences. Nature Communications, 11, 2665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16440-0

Hewson, E. R. F. (2018). Students’ emotional engagement, motivation and behaviour over the life of an online course: reflections on two market research case studies. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(10), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.472

Jabs, J., Devine, C. M., Bisogni, C. A., Farrell, T. J., Jastran, M., & Wethington, E. (2007). Trying to find the quickest way: employed mothers’ constructions of time for food. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.011

Kapoor, H., Inamdar, V., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021). I didn’t have time! A qualitative exploration of misbehaviors in academic contexts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09407-3

Larsson, J., Andersson, D., & Nässén, J. (2017). Subjective temporal well-being: Defining, measuring, and applying a new concept. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1306201. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1306201

Liles, J., Vuk, J., & Tariq, S. (2018). Study habits of medical students: An analysis of which study habits most contribute to success in the preclinical years. MedEdPublish, 7, 61. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000061.1

Loxterkamp, D. (2014). Staying ahead of getting behind: Reflections on “scarcity.” BMJ, 348, g2634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2634

Lynch, J. G., & Zauberman, G. (2006). When do you want it? Time, decisions, and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.67

Macquet, A.-C., & Skalej, V. (2015). Time management in elite sports: How do elite athletes manage time under fatigue and stress conditions? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(2), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12105

May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z

Mitsui, K. (2022) The relationship between coping mechanisms and the scarcity mindset. Undergraduate Research, 2(2), article 21. https://kb.gcsu.edu/undergraduateresearch/vol2/iss2/21

Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Blasiman, R., & Hollis, R. B. (2019). Note-taking habits of 21st Century college students: Implications for student learning, memory, and achievement. Memory (Hove, England), 27(6), 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694

Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. Henry Holt and Company.

Nonis, S. A. (1997). The relationship of perceived stress and academic performance to perceived control of time. Marketing Education Review, 7(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.1997.11488572

Ortagus, J. C. (2017). From the periphery to prominence: An examination of the changing profile of online students in American higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.002

Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., Graham, M., & Shaw, R. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note taking, and test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.335

Schroeder, M., Makarenko, E., & Warren, K. (2019). Introducing a late bank in online graduate courses: The response of students. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8200

Serventy, E., & Allen, B. (2022). Generation 1.5 learners: Removing the mask of student invisibility and recognizing the learning disconnections that marred their academic journeys. Student Success, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1867

Shaikh, S. J., & Cruz, I. (2022) AI in human teams; Effects on technology use, members’ interactions, and creative performance under time scarcity. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01335-5

U.S. Dept. of Education. (2021). Fast Facts: Distance Learning. Nces.ed.gov; National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80

Van der Meer, J., Jansen, E., & Torenbeek, M. (2010). “It’s almost a mindset that teachers need to change”: First-year students’ need to be inducted into time management. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 777-791. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903383211

Watson, F. F., Castano Bishop, M., & Ferdinand-James, D. (2017). Instructional strategies to help online students learn: Feedback from online students. TechTrends, 61(5), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0216-y

Zhao, J., & Tomm, B. (2018). Psychological responses to scarcity. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.41