Apprentissage inversé amélioré par le Web : une étude de cas

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27905

Mots-clés :

amélioré par la web, apprentissage inversé approche hybride, cours de compétences d'étude, autorégulation, classes nombreuses, engagement des étudiants, rétroaction individuelle

Résumé

Cette étude de recherche est un projet pilote d'apprentissage inversé assisté par la technologie visant à observer l'engagement et l'apprentissage des étudiants dans une classe autorégulée par le biais de leur rétroaction individuelle. L'apprentissage inversé a été appliqué à un segment du cours de compétences d'étude pendant plus de deux semaines aux 129 étudiants en première année d'un collège d'enseignants à Bahreïn. Répartis en quatre sections, les étudiants ont travaillé en petits groupes, ont préparé une partie du contenu du cours fourni par une plateforme d'apprentissage en ligne et l'ont présentée au reste de la classe. Les étudiants ont utilisé des affiches, des cartes de support visuel et des technologies numériques sous différentes formes telles que des diapositives PowerPoint, des téléphones portables et Kahoot! Les réflexions individuelles des étudiants sur cette expérience ont été analysées quantitativement et qualitativement. Les résultats montrent une réaction favorable au travail de groupe, au partage des idées, au gain de temps grâce à la collaboration et à l'utilisation de la technologie. Il est recommandé d'étendre l'étude à un échantillon plus large, à un plus grand nombre de sujets de cours, et d'inclure l'utilisation de différentes formes de technologie.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Bani Arora, University of Bahrain

Bani Arora is a lecturer at the Bahrain Teachers’ College at the University of Bahrain. She participated in the blended learning pilot project with regards to the Study Skills course. She coordinated the course and compiled all the information to study the impact of web-enhanced learning.

Naman Arora, University of Guelph

Naman Arora completed his Bachelor of Commerce degree in accounting at the University of Guelph, Canada. He has worked in numerous technology-focused roles, with a specialization in database-building and data science. In his current role as journalist at Gulf Daily News, he covers technology and business, amongst other topics.

Références

Avci, H., & Adiguzel, T. (2017). A case study on mobile-blended collaborative learning in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3261

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June 23). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings.

Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education and Accreditation, 6(1), 33-43.

Cottrell, S. (2013). The study skills handbook (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

Danker, B. (2015). Using flipped classroom approach to explore deep learning in large classrooms. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(1), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.3.1.10

Davies, C. (2013). Flipped or inverted learning: Strategies for course design. In E. G. Smyth & J. X. Volker (Eds.), Enhancing instruction with visual media: Utilizing video and lecture capture, 241-265. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-3962-1.ch017

Dean, K. L., & Wright, S. (2016). Embedding engaged learning in high enrollment lecture- based classes. Higher Education, 74(4), 651-668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0070-4

Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: A low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00159e

Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1

Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). The Four Pillars of F-L-I-P™. https://www.flippedpl.ca/uploads/2/3/9/6/23960677/flip_handout_fnl_web__1_.pdf

Futch, L. S., DeNoyelles, A., Thompson, K., & Howard, W. (2016). “Comfort” as a critical success factor in blended learning courses. Online Learning, 20(3), 140-158. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.978

Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, pp. 777-786. https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368198

Gomez-Lanier, L. (2018). Building collaboration in the flipped classroom: A case study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120207

Hung, M., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 81, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380109601795

Lundberg, C. A., & Sheridan, D. (2015). Benefits of engagement with peers, faculty, and diversity for online learners. College Teaching, 63(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2014.972317

Midun, H., Degeng, I. N. S., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2019). Effects of inverted classroom and self-regulated learning on conceptual learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 8(2), 181-200.

Milthorpe, N., Clarke, R., Fletcher, L., Moore, R., & Stark, H. (2018). Blended English: Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in English literary studies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 17(3), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022217722140

Montgomery, A. P., Hayward, D. V., Dunn, W., Carbonaro, M., & Amrhein, C. G. (2015). Blending for student engagement: Lessons learned for MOOCs and beyond. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1869

O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

Overmyer, G. R. (2014). The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Colorado State University.

Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v8i2.640

Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (2013). Blended learning: Research perspectives. Routledge.

Ravenscroft, B., & Luhanga, U. (2018). Enhancing student engagement through an institutional blended learning initiative: A case study. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 6(2), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.8

Sengel, E. (2016). To FLIP or not to FLIP: Comparative case study in higher education in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.034

Snow, K. (2016). Social justice or status quo? Blended learning in a Western Canadian teacher education program. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21432/t23k8t

Strayer, J. F. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.

Sulaiman, N. A. (2018). Implementing blended learning and flipped learning models in the university classroom: A case study. Teaching English with Technology, 18(4), 34-47.

Thurab-Nkhosi, D. (2018). Implementing a blended/online leaning policy on a face-to-face campus: Perspectives of administrators and implications for change. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 133-147.

Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of blended learning environment: A case study in Malaysia. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9293-5

Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2021-08-09

Numéro

Vol. 47 No. 1 (2021): Hiver

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

© Bani Arora, Naman Arora 2021

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.

Droits d’auteur

Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent le droit de la première publication de la revue avec le travail simultanément sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) qui permet aux autres de partager le travail avec une reconnaissance de la paternité de l'œuvre et la publication initiale dans ce journal.